Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   No bid contracts? Deja Vu all over again (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25829)

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
What am I overlooking? I just hope you never have a child with a disability or whatever.


You're unable to see she made a decision that resulted in unnecessarily bringing a Down Syndrome Child into the world. She's running for an important spot in our Government. All her decisions need to be looked at for quality, and this is a pathetic decision. You're incapable of seeing it as a bad decision, but the results are undeniably poor. DUH!! Keep thinking it's a good decision for a 43 year old to have a 5th child. I'm sure the Catholic Church will agree, and encourage 47 year olds to pump out an extra. Both you and them can then ignore the fact you encouraged the production of a Down Syndrome Child. Your last sentence is that you hope I never have a child with a disability or whatever, but through the whole evening you've encouraged older women(who have given birth multiple times) to have children that have a high chance of being handicapped. You've done nothing but back her poor decision all night long. Even when the punishment (for taking the risk )is directly in front of you, you still encourage them to take the risk. Then you refuse to take responsibility for the result. Somehow, I am called a nut because I dare call a decision (with awful results) a stupid decision. People get cancer from smoking cigarettes. Down Syndrome kids often get produced by woman in their 40's with previous births. Both stupid, and both preventable.

Mortimer 10-27-2008 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
You're unable to see she made a decision that resulted in unnecessarily bringing a Down Syndrome Child into the world. She's running for an important spot in our Government. All her decisions need to be looked at for quality, and this is a pathetic decision. You're incapable of seeing it as a bad decision, but the results are undeniably poor. DUH!! Keep thinking it's a good decision for a 43 year old to have a 5th child. I'm sure the Catholic Church will agree, and encourage 47 year olds to pump out an extra. Both you and them can then ignore the fact you encouraged the production of a Down Syndrome Child. Your last sentence is that you hope I never have a child with a disability or whatever, but through the whole evening you've encouraged older women(who have given birth multiple times) to have children that have a high chance of being handicapped. You've done nothing but back her poor decision all night long. Even when the punishment (for taking the risk )is directly in front of you, you still encourage them to take the risk. Then you refuse to take responsibility for the result. Somehow, I am called a nut because I dare call a decision (with awful results) a stupid decision. People get cancer from smoking cigarettes. Down Syndrome kids often get produced by woman in their 40's with previous births. Both stupid, and both preventable.

This guy's gotta be a riot at anti abortion rallies.

Mortimer 10-27-2008 01:45 AM

This message is hidden because Mortimer is on your ignore list. He mainly comes here to talk about other posters on the site. To Mortimer, the subjects being written about are not nearly as important as who is doing the writing. To him, that's the subject.

I hate to be a poopie...but this creature is doorknob dumb.

Easy prey.



For those of you having trouble following along at home...it's not you--it's him.





I imagine by tomorrow his signature will grow by 5 paragraphs along with a plethora of specific exemplars.






Don't ya know.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 02:06 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmHbE...eature=related

Sarah Palin's been seen driving around town with a new man....Some guy named "KING."

Danzig 10-27-2008 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
You're unable to see she made a decision that resulted in unnecessarily bringing a Down Syndrome Child into the world. She's running for an important spot in our Government. All her decisions need to be looked at for quality, and this is a pathetic decision. You're incapable of seeing it as a bad decision, but the results are undeniably poor. DUH!! Keep thinking it's a good decision for a 43 year old to have a 5th child. I'm sure the Catholic Church will agree, and encourage 47 year olds to pump out an extra. Both you and them can then ignore the fact you encouraged the production of a Down Syndrome Child. Your last sentence is that you hope I never have a child with a disability or whatever, but through the whole evening you've encouraged older women(who have given birth multiple times) to have children that have a high chance of being handicapped. You've done nothing but back her poor decision all night long. Even when the punishment (for taking the risk )is directly in front of you, you still encourage them to take the risk. Then you refuse to take responsibility for the result. Somehow, I am called a nut because I dare call a decision (with awful results) a stupid decision. People get cancer from smoking cigarettes. Down Syndrome kids often get produced by woman in their 40's with previous births. Both stupid, and both preventable.

kids=punishment? interesting.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
kids=punishment? interesting.

I'm sure she wasn't hoping for a D.S. baby. Yes, when a 43 year old makes the choice to have a 5th child, then they are gambling. Some are gunna be punished for ignoring the odds. A lot of people want to adopt, but I haven't heard many say they want a D.S. child (instead of a healthy child.) Tons of ads for pets, but 3 legged dog isn't a popular breed(yet.) Given a situation, people will accept almost anything in a week or two. Whether it be a death, or a terminal illness. Whatever it is. People accept it, and try to move on. So, they've accepted their punishment, and moved on. They didn't have to have this take place. They could of been responsible enough to stop having kids after 40. She is trying to sell herself as smart. That was stupid.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I just noticed that. Can't take the heat I guess.

I am not gunna talk to some sick pup(MORTY FROM MARS) that has double meanings for everything(and only the 2nd guy in his head knows what they are.) All I've got to say to that irritant is: take your fkn Schitzo meds, and maybe they'll find something in the Amazon that will cure you eventually. Keep hope alive, btch.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 10:39 AM

Indiana Reuters/Zogby McCain 50, Obama 44 McCain +6
:$: :$: :$: :$:

IT'S ABOUT TIME.

Coach Pants 10-27-2008 10:52 AM

What about Ohio and Missouri?

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
What about Ohio and Missouri?

McCain has lost the last 4 polls in Ohio by 3-10 points. Missouri is the definition of tied.

Coach Pants 10-27-2008 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
McCain has lost the last 4 polls in Ohio by 3-10 points. Missouri is the definition of tied.

Ohio is full of racists. They must be focusing the polls in Cleveland.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Ohio is full of racists. They must be focusing the polls in Cleveland.

Johnny is in Ohio trying to save it.

Coach Pants 10-27-2008 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Johnny is in Ohio trying to save it.

I can't see a republican losing Ohio.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I'll let them decide if it was a good decision or not.

They have a D Syndrome child. That wasn't the result they were looking for. They made a bad decision. They have to live with the result of their poor decision. The reason we don't agree is because you're afraid to admit that the result(a D.S. child) is a poor one. You've been brainwashed to say it's a fine result. I just didn't go along with the brainwashing when it was tried on me. It's not the result they wanted. It's a poor result that came from a poor decision(43 year old pssy being used to make a child for the 5th time=bad decision.)

philcski 10-27-2008 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
I'm sure she wasn't hoping for a D.S. baby. Yes, when a 43 year old makes the choice to have a 5th child, then they are gambling. Some are gunna be punished for ignoring the odds. A lot of people want to adopt, but I haven't heard many say they want a D.S. child (instead of a healthy child.) Tons of ads for pets, but 3 legged dog isn't a popular breed(yet.) Given a situation, people will accept almost anything in a week or two. Whether it be a death, or a terminal illness. Whatever it is. People accept it, and try to move on. So, they've accepted their punishment, and moved on. They didn't have to have this take place. They could of been responsible enough to stop having kids after 40. She is trying to sell herself as smart. That was stupid.

She didn't have the kid in the first place.

timmgirvan 10-27-2008 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
They have a D Syndrome child. That wasn't the result they were looking for. They made a bad decision. They have to live with the result of their poor decision. The reason we don't agree is because you're afraid to admit that the result(a D.S. child) is a poor one. You've been brainwashed to say it's a fine result. I just didn't go along with the brainwashing when it was tried on me. It's not the result they wanted. It's a poor result that came from a poor decision(43 year old pssy being used to make a child for the 5th time=bad decision.)

Sorry Scuds, your argument doesn't add up! You have no idea what any parent thinks when they have a child...you just have an opinion.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
I can't see a republican losing Ohio.

I would say I THINK IT'S NORMALLY VERY STUBBORNLY RED. Dewine is way behind against the Dem in the Senate race. The Governor race isn't close(Dem has drawn off.) The only reason to think it might still be close for President is the fact it is a racist state.

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Sorry Scuds, your argument doesn't add up! You have no idea what any parent thinks when they have a child...you just have an opinion.

O.K., Down Syndrome was one of the results they had hoped for. You're right.

dalakhani 10-27-2008 12:01 PM

Are you guys trying to tell me that longoria was NOT trying to stick his glove up Rollins's butt last night? It was clear from the replay.

Antitrust32 10-27-2008 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
Are you guys trying to tell me that longoria was NOT trying to stick his glove up Rollins's butt last night? It was clear from the replay.

Dala that was great... I couldnt stop laughing especially since they kept "blowing up" that image and just focused on the glove stuck between the butt cheeks!

I wonder if Werth felt violated?

Antitrust32 10-27-2008 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I don't think he was intentionally, but it sure did look like it. That wasn't the result he was looking for. He made a bad decision. He has to live with the result of his poor decision. The reason we don't agree is because you're afraid to admit that the result (glove up the ass) is a poor one. You've been brainwashed to say it's a fine result. I just didn't go along with the brainwashing when it was tried on me. It's not the result he wanted. It's a poor result that came from a poor decision(trying to stick your glove up someone's ass during the world series = bad decision)


OOOOOOOOOO :tro: :tro:

Rudeboyelvis 10-27-2008 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike
Q: What is the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina??










A: Nothing! They both shout "Drill, Baby, Drill"


hmmmm....not bad... How about,


Q: What is the difference between Sarah Palin's left ear and her vagina?









A: Only some of the things that go into her vagina immediately depart through her right ear....




;) :tro:





actually this makes no sense, but you get the point.....

SCUDSBROTHER 10-27-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Dude, get some help. Seriously. You're nuts. The reason we don't agree is because you are insane. So by your line of thinking had the baby been born fine, the decision would have been good right?

No, they would have just gotten away with making a poor decision(just like 75 year old chainsmokers have.)

philcski 10-27-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
She didn't have the kid in the first place.

I guess no one cares about my conspiracy theory.

GBBob 10-27-2008 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
No, they would have just gotten away with making a poor decision(just like 75 year old chainsmokers have.)

I can't agree Scuds. Especially comparing chain smoking to having a baby at plus 40. I find it hard to believe that they didn't investigate and know the odds of having a Down's Baby at their age and make the decision that they would welcome the child no matter what. Is this baby a burden on society? I don't believe she should be Vice President, let alone President, but her having a Down's Baby has absolutely nothing to do with that, as it shouldn't. Drinking and driving is a bad decision, chain smoking is a bad decision/addiction, saying she understands International Policy because she can see Russia was a bad decision. Raising a Down's Child is an admirable one, IMO.

And if this pregancy was an accident, then certainly their personal beliefs on abortion would have made that decision simple in their minds.

Link to Down's Risk:
http://www.babycenter.com/404_what-a...-older_3127.bc

dalakhani 10-27-2008 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
I guess no one cares about my conspiracy theory.

I agree, but more importantly phil, what did you think about the glove up the butt? Fox framed it and everything.

There is no doubt there was leather up his butt. At very least, you have to agree, that was probably a mean wedgie.

GBBob 10-27-2008 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
I agree, but more importantly phil, what did you think about the glove up the butt? Fox framed it and everything.

There is no doubt there was leather up his butt. At very least, you have to agree, that was probably a mean wedgie.

There was a second glove..

just wait

Mortimer 10-27-2008 12:57 PM

Hewo!


I am a fwoggie!!



----------------------------------------------------
SkidsMother is on an ignore list. He mainly comes here to talk about his out of body experiences. To SkidsMother, the subjects being written about are not nearly as important as his representation of the lunatic fringe's opinion of said subject. To him, insanity is the subject.

GBBob 10-27-2008 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
OOOOOOOOOO

I can't believe I/we just defended Sarah Palin:zz:

Antitrust32 10-27-2008 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mortimer
Hewo!


I am a fwoggie!!



----------------------------------------------------
[B]SkidsMother is on an ignore list. He mainly comes here to talk about his out of body experiences. To SkidsMother, the subjects being written about are not nearly as important as his representation of the lunatic fringe's opinion of said subject. To him, insanity is the subject[/b].


that is just plain brilliant... great work friend

philcski 10-27-2008 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani
I agree, but more importantly phil, what did you think about the glove up the butt? Fox framed it and everything.

There is no doubt there was leather up his butt. At very least, you have to agree, that was probably a mean wedgie.

I missed it. I have 0 interest in this World Series and have watched maybe 5 innings, total.

And baseball is my favorite sport played by humans.

Antitrust32 10-27-2008 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
I missed it. I have 0 interest in this World Series and have watched maybe 5 innings, total.

And baseball is my favorite sport played by humans.


How can you have no interest in the Phighting Phils???? I dOnT gEt It??

philcski 10-27-2008 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
How can you have no interest in the Phighting Phils???? I dOnT gEt It??

:p

Im a Met fan!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.