![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
2. The Gov sure seemed to think that the %'s were greater than 50/50. And the taxpayers of NY are screwed either way and if you live in NY and dont get this... 3. I find it amusing people are so fascinated by my career. I am successful enough to buy 1/2 a million dollars worth of horses with my signature. I have done enough to warrant purchasing a 100 acre farm with $400000 worth of equipment. Of course I only employ 15 people but none of them work in sweatshops like your 200. Bene is almost assuredly living off his meager NYRA pension. |
Quote:
And it certainly didn't involve malfeasance given there is no obligation on NYRA to put work like that out to bid. There was nothing illegal about giving the assignment to his son in law's agency. Nepotism maybe, but not malfeasant. You want to punish malfeasance? Go after the Albany Legislature phonies who pushed to have their cars serviced by the NYRA mechanics and filled their gas tanks at the pumps at the backstretch garage. Or were siphoning wood and work off the NYRA teet by making carpenters build porches at their summer cottages... You're goring the wrong ox. |
Quote:
You think NYRA is so bad? Wait until Stronach croaks and Magna sells off the rest of the tracks... |
CS maybe I wasn't clear on my point. If the NYRA has the oversight, great. I won't dispute that. I am no expert. Let the NYRA run with the ball that the bidding process gave them. Next step...the casino operator.
|
For those of you that think 30 years is too long....
The land claim is worth in excess of $1 Billion. If anything, NYRA may have sold their equity in that claim short by getting " only " 30 years. Being that they are better than 50% to win the claim they are forgoing over a half a billion dollars in value. Those of you that think they should have settled for less than 30 years should be careful next time you are in any kind of bargaining position. Those of you that think NYRA should not get a franchise extension need to tell us which bidder should get the franchise and why. Otherwise your arguments hold no water. It is a CHOICE by the Governor. Please tell us why he chose the wrong candidate and why. |
Quote:
As far as the land, I don't understand why this is still subject to debate. Sure, you never know how a case might turn out, and I've learned that lesson well -- however, counsel for both sides, during discovery seemed to arrive at the same conclusion, that being, it was significantly more probable than possible that NYRA would end up winning the land dispute. I think more importantly, the creditors committee and their legal counsel arrived at that conclusion. While I am sure few even know who those firms and players are, they are far more qualified to voice an opinion on such matters. Eric |
I understand what you're saying, Eric, but I'm simply explaining why the State granted NYRA such a seemingly long extension.
|
I got that. I guess it just depends on how you look at it.
Eric |
Quote:
Its so easy when a poster can look up public records. Its much easier to be a critic than a builder. |
Quote:
http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/rep...yra_report.pdf Seeing how this report was founded by the now Governor and NYRA supporter, he may want to give us some truthful insight into how he came to the conclusion that NYRA now is better then the NYRA he wanted thrown under the bus a few years ago. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That said, to say NYRA is free and clear of any problems is fatuous. |
Quote:
Not to sound like Oracle but I called this years ago. Spitzers loves to ride in on a white horse. I also have been waiting for a politician to come up with a state agency to run the whole thing. The only surprising thing was it took Bruno so long to break out his idea which certainly wasn't cooked up recently. Strong politicians love state agencies because they control them, which leads to greater power for them. They will throw out the old "We run the state and its 100 billion dollar budget. How hard can a couple of racetracks and a casino be?" argument. Watch, it will happen. I mean why let some outside companies or NYRA have any control when they can create a public agency that can "make" the state a bunch of money for the local pork projects and create more political patronage jobs? |
Quote:
I also see the NYRA of today -- much improved, certainly not ideal and perfect, but far improved nevertheless. I also see -- and very much hope to see -- the potential newly created, reconstituted, reformatted, whatever you want to call it NYRA -- the NYRA of the very near future. I want to see a transparent NYRA, one that is held accountable and one that works WITH the NYTHA, the state, the legislature, the owners, breeders, fans, bettors and everyone else. That is what I see the state pretty much demanding from a new NYRA. If NYRA can't meet these standards, then there must be repercussions. I never saw that possibilility from the "for profit" model, the "investors" or whatever you might want to call it. Like I've always said, I like the Woodbine model and what I've seen there, but I don't like what I see at Finger Lakes. That is the business model of the "franchise holder" and that is what the success or failure of NY racing will hinge upon. Who gets the credit is not important to me. If Al Gore wants to say he invented the internet, then so be it. It's semantics. I more care that the internet is there. Eric |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NYRA maybe improved, but it still needs much more reform (internally and with help from the State) to be a better not-for-profit. Which brings up another interesting point. I have not seen anyone mention that NYRA is not, I believe, a "non-profit" but a "not-for-profit." While the differences are debatable, I believe they are very different. Its a different discussion, but one that I feel should be included when discussing the profitablity and bankruptcy's of NYRA and the State of NY. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As far as Spitzer, I expect many people to have different opinions and tastes. That's why Baskin-Robbins has all those flavors, LOL. Regarding the not for profit and nonprofit aspect, I've heard too many people debate nonprofit, not for profit, quasi-nonprofit, quasi this, that, and so on. Professionally, and personally, I have much involvement in the (let's just call it) nonprofit world. I wouldn't debate the issue, as in this forum it's a fallacious arguement. However, not for profit and nonprofit -- both are a tax status, they are not a management style. Eric |
Quote:
Love that Bball. And I got some slight association with some of the Spurs staff. I give them the once over on every detail. Pester them I do. I will tell you RC Buford is a good man. Ask your cousin. And if he did not know it, tell him. Man knows talent. And Morton really likes me. Mutual respect of the bizarre and childish. |
Quote:
Agreed. I also have much involvement in that not-for-profit/non-profit world. However we are an independent contractor that makes our profit on making these non-profits/not-for-profits capital gain. If we don't enable them to increase capital, we don't make our income. Many sides of the die in the non-profit/not-for-profit world. It truely is an issue that, I feel, should be debated in the case of NYRA and NYS, but perhaps not in this discussion in this thread, it seems complicated and agressive enough... |
Quote:
I'm not sure how the awarding of the deal to Schwart's family without going through bid does not constitute violation of the Racing and Breeding law. Sec 213.5.a reads like this: "All contracts entered into by a non-profit racing association for the procurement of goods or services of a value in excess of two hundred fifty thousand dollars shall be awarded only by a process of competitive bidding approved by the board." In fairness, the next pp does list two exemptions to the comp bidding requirement, specifically "sole source" and "Emergency" exemptions. In my readings, I didn't come across any reference an exemptiom related to the Schwartz family deal. In addition to the NY Racing law, nyra's own policy guidelines require certain competitive bidding actions and also make specific reference to "related third-party" dealings. If, as you say, Schwartz, et al were somehow unencumbered by these requirements, so be it. But the fact that this no-bid deal was cited in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement is probably enough to cause a lot of folks to have a negative view, notwithstanding the fact that the results of the work were arguably admirable. As far as nyra being a non-profit and some of the comments I've read about cost control and positive financial results having less importance than in for-profit models, that's a bunch of hogwash (oxen-wash?) I spent 20+ years working for a mutual insurance carrier and the model is similar to a non-profit... you are supposed to make money. It's not called profit but instead is referred to as "contribution to surplus." Some is used to grow the business but much is returned to certain policyholders as a dividend. NYRA should be run no differently. I'm just a guy who is a fan and my only point is that public-trust entities have a very difficult time overcoming acts of impropriety and, more importantly, acts of perceived impropriety. I just hope things are run better there in the future. Most important, all of this slot-machine stuff is just awful for the sport. The life cycle of slots producing positive results for racing is going to be very, very short. At most, the positive results will last 10 years (Mountaineer) but more likely 10 weeks (Gulfstream). And, yes, the state employees lining up for free car washes, etc.. should be punished. I must hit the road. There's a herd of ox I've identified I need to pursue out on Alligator Alley. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.