Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Cigar was the best horse in the last 30 years (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16355)

dr. fager 08-30-2007 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Speaking realistically about something isn't dissing it.


correct, dissing would be the fact she's lucky Risen Star got a bad ride...lol

When both as a broodmare had a top earner around 500k and nothing else isn't dissing. Her top earner did have a decent earner in Japan sired by Sunday Silence.

Indian Charlie 08-30-2007 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buffymommy
OH DON'T MAKE ME BEYOTCH SLAP YOU. DON'T YOU DISS ON MY GIRL WINNING COLORS. :mad:

are you kidding me? i loved that filly. i even bet her in the derby, with my friend telling me when she was 2 there was no way she'd lose the derby!

alysheba4 08-30-2007 01:58 PM

risen star, now that was an underated horse...........if he didnt get a hack job for a ride in the derby he would have won that race.

horseofcourse 08-30-2007 05:20 PM

I think Rags to Riches grueling summer of races is bringing all kinds of new fans to the sport. I can't even remember what she looks like!! (this is in relation to the post that said Cigar brought many new fans to the sport!)

On the topic of Cigar, I think he is better than he is being given credit for than most on this thread. I think KG lists way too many on his list. To me the best thing a horse can do is race a lot and win a lot. Cigar did that and most others listed don't. To me that is like saying Kevin Kouzmanoff is the best player in major league baseball, because the first pitch he saw as a big leaguer last year he hit a grand slam home run. And that just isn't true stating he is the best. But how many hall of famers hit the first pitch they saw for a grand slam?? Just because Ghostzapper could roll out 120 plus Beyers at will does not make him better than Cigar in my opinion. Just faster. HE had more grade 1 wins than Ghostzapper had starts. Going back 30 years picking up Affirmed and Bid and others...no way is he the best. But 25 years there are not too many better in my opinion. Some of the late 80s ones like Alysheba, and EG..SS perhaps, but I'm not too sure. Easy Goer and Sunday Silence did nothing as older horses.

robfla 08-30-2007 05:21 PM

the only way Discreet Cat or Smarty Jones would beat Cigar in a 1 1/4m race is if Discreet Cat ran the first 5 furlongs and Smarty Jones ran the last 5 furlongs

pmayjr 08-30-2007 05:41 PM

I'm too new to know for sure. But I'm wondering if I'll ever see one better than Ghostzapper.

Danzig 08-30-2007 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmayjr
I'm too new to know for sure. But I'm wondering if I'll ever see one better than Ghostzapper.

i'd be happier if i saw horses more durable than him. but when you read about half ours retiring after his abbreviated career, you have to wonder....

Indian Charlie 08-30-2007 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfla
the only way Discreet Cat or Smarty Jones would beat Cigar in a 1 1/4m race is if Discreet Cat ran the first 5 furlongs and Smarty Jones ran the last 5 furlongs


hey dude, how come i cant see your avatar?

The Bid 08-30-2007 07:03 PM

I think Smarty was a better horse than Cigar.

robfla 08-30-2007 09:48 PM

as much as i like smarty - maybe at 7f or a mile... but cigar had that burst of speed at the 3/8 pole that just inhaled the field when he went 9-10f.




Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie
hey dude, how come i cant see your avatar?

oh, and charlie.. the avatar is clear as a bell.. a naked blonde, don't know why YOU can't see it

King Glorious 08-31-2007 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slewbopper
I was a Bull fan so have no great love for Cigar, but do respect what he did. How can you place horses like Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Discreet Cat, and Giant's Causeway ahead of Cigar? None of them ran more than 10 races in their careers. Cigar had more than that many G1 wins.

Based on what I think was their ability levels, not accomplishments. Had they run as many times as Cigar did, I think they would have accomplished quite a bit more than they did. I was only listing them according to what I thought each horse was capable of at his best. I thought Cigar's best attribute was his consistency, not his brilliance.

miraja2 08-31-2007 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Based on what I think was their ability levels, not accomplishments. Had they run as many times as Cigar did, I think they would have accomplished quite a bit more than they did. I was only listing them according to what I thought each horse was capable of at his best. I thought Cigar's best attribute was his consistency, not his brilliance.

This is what makes all these comparisons difficult. How can anyone really compare two horses like say..........Ghostzapper and John Henry and determine who was "better"? One guy could point to speed figs and overall winning percentage in races and conclude that Ghostzapper was CLEARLY better. Another could look at number of G1 races won and decide that John Henry was far and away a better horse. Which one is right? It all depends. Personally I would rate John Henry higher than Ghostzapper because he accomplished a lot more. But if the two were to square off in a race on the dirt, I would pick Ghostzapper. It almost seems like this question of who is the "best" is actually two different questions merged into one.
1) Who accomplished the most?
2) Who would win if they all met in a race?

VOL JACK 08-31-2007 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bid
I think Smarty was a better horse than Cigar.

And bernardini was better than Smarty.

somerfrost 08-31-2007 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VOL JACK
And bernardini was better than Smarty.

Bernardini folded like a tent the first time a horse looked him in the eye! Alysheba was right about Risen Star although I don't blame Eddie D for that ride, the trainer (sic) and his big-mouth owner instructed Eddie to fall back out of the number one hole despite the fact that all the speed (including Winning Colors) drew outside...he was left with more than any horse could possibly do turning for home yet rallied bravely for third...had he been used early to gain a forward stalking position, we'd have 12 Triple Crown winners now! Risen Star was a great horse, Secretariat's best and that says a lot with the inclusion of "The Iron Lady"!

Danzig 08-31-2007 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I'm not so sure Bernardini folded like a tent. He was passed by Invasor, who as we know was undefeated here and multiple grade 1 winner. There is no shame in running second to him in the Classic IMO.

i wouldn't say he folded either.
but i also wouldn't say that bernardini was better than smarty.

smuthg 08-31-2007 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Based on what I think was their ability levels, not accomplishments. Had they run as many times as Cigar did, I think they would have accomplished quite a bit more than they did. I was only listing them according to what I thought each horse was capable of at his best. I thought Cigar's best attribute was his consistency, not his brilliance.

I thought Cigar's B/C Classic win was pretty damn brilliant...

smuthg 08-31-2007 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig
i wouldn't say he folded either.
but i also wouldn't say that bernardini was better than smarty.

agreed on Smarty over Bernardini. the best comment on Smarty I have ever heard was that "Smarty Jones was a freak that could run fast and far, and both at the same time..."

That being said, give me all of the past B/C Classic winners at Belmont Park for one 1 1/4 race and I'll take Cigar...

Danzig 08-31-2007 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smuthg
agreed on Smarty over Bernardini. the best comment on Smarty I have ever heard was that "Smarty Jones was a freak that could run fast and far, and both at the same time..."

That being said, give me all of the past B/C Classic winners at Belmont Park for one 1 1/4 race and I'll take Cigar...

cigar over unbridled, i won't argue...but over tiznow? now that would be a race to see.

King Glorious 08-31-2007 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smuthg
I thought Cigar's B/C Classic win was pretty damn brilliant...

His race that day wasn't even as good as Inside Information's.

Buffymommy 08-31-2007 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Speaking realistically about something isn't dissing it.


I was only kidding around. Although I do love that filly.

Merlinsky 08-31-2007 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost
Personally, I think Risen Star may have been the best since The Bid but he never got to prove it...to many "ifs" but the Star's Belmont (on three good hooves) was a sight to see! Likewise, I rank Secretariat and Kincsem at the top of my "all time" list yet there is no way to prove they belong any more than others. The "who did he/she beat" argument is a bit meaningless to me...who did Man O War beat? Certainly I can argue that he ducked the best of his generation...Exterminator. He did handle a worn-down Sir Barton. Ribot destroyed all he faced but what was their quality? Fun discussion but simply a matter of personal opinion.

Nah the 'ducked Exterminator' bit actually isn't legitimate as a flaw for Man O'War based on what we now know. I highly recommend the book by Dorothy Ours for MOW info and I believe that's where I read this (I'm not at home right now and don't have the book with me to double check but I'm pretty sure about it). It's actually a misconception that's been going on for awhile. Exterminator could've been in the match race with Sir Barton and MOW but there was a caveat, he would only be in it if the race were longer (not that they liked the location either but it was mainly a distance question). Once the other two owners settled on preferred distance, it meant Exterminator would be at a disadvantage. Now if you wanted them to face each other at 1 1/2 to 2 miles we can argue the best horse (except we're not really comparing these other great horses for their ability to get 2 miles) but his owners were definitely not going to go up against MOW and Sir Barton at anything like 1 1/4 or lower. They made that decision so I'll argue that Exterminator actually ducked MOW, not the other way around. They did try to work out a three-horse race. I think they should've gone for it. Exterminator probably would've beaten a sore-hooved Sir Barton that day which ain't chump change since he was still a talented horse. Might've actually made MOW break a sweat. As it was there was really no contest.

Colin and Fair Play don't get enough attention. Talk about guts and talent. All that sparring and finally Fair Play managed to run Colin off his feet at the end, Colin still won, and got so fried it was a Pyhrric victory.

KirisClown 08-31-2007 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I have a question for the Smarty Jones people. Was he better than Holy Bull?


For those that answer "yes"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FTWSlxQ4aE

_ed_ 08-31-2007 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky
Nah the 'ducked Exterminator' bit actually isn't legitimate as a flaw for Man O'War based on what we now know. I highly recommend the book by Dorothy Ours for MOW info and I believe that's where I read this (I'm not at home right now and don't have the book with me to double check but I'm pretty sure about it). It's actually a misconception that's been going on for awhile. Exterminator could've been in the match race with Sir Barton and MOW but there was a caveat, he would only be in it if the race were longer (not that they liked the location either but it was mainly a distance question). Once the other two owners settled on preferred distance, it meant Exterminator would be at a disadvantage. Now if you wanted them to face each other at 1 1/2 to 2 miles we can argue the best horse (except we're not really comparing these other great horses for their ability to get 2 miles) but his owners were definitely not going to go up against MOW and Sir Barton at anything like 1 1/4 or lower. They made that decision so I'll argue that Exterminator actually ducked MOW, not the other way around.

Yeah the book did say that, just finished reading it last week myself. Great read it was too.

Danzig 08-31-2007 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merlinsky
Nah the 'ducked Exterminator' bit actually isn't legitimate as a flaw for Man O'War based on what we now know. I highly recommend the book by Dorothy Ours for MOW info and I believe that's where I read this (I'm not at home right now and don't have the book with me to double check but I'm pretty sure about it). It's actually a misconception that's been going on for awhile. Exterminator could've been in the match race with Sir Barton and MOW but there was a caveat, he would only be in it if the race were longer (not that they liked the location either but it was mainly a distance question). Once the other two owners settled on preferred distance, it meant Exterminator would be at a disadvantage. Now if you wanted them to face each other at 1 1/2 to 2 miles we can argue the best horse (except we're not really comparing these other great horses for their ability to get 2 miles) but his owners were definitely not going to go up against MOW and Sir Barton at anything like 1 1/4 or lower. They made that decision so I'll argue that Exterminator actually ducked MOW, not the other way around. They did try to work out a three-horse race. I think they should've gone for it. Exterminator probably would've beaten a sore-hooved Sir Barton that day which ain't chump change since he was still a talented horse. Might've actually made MOW break a sweat. As it was there was really no contest.

Colin and Fair Play don't get enough attention. Talk about guts and talent. All that sparring and finally Fair Play managed to run Colin off his feet at the end, Colin still won, and got so fried it was a Pyhrric victory.

i believe they also didn't like the thought of weight for age, the gelding would have been giving weight to the original big red.

Riot 08-31-2007 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _ed_
Yeah the book did say that, just finished reading it last week myself. Great read it was too.

What do you think about all the drug use?

_ed_ 08-31-2007 10:31 PM

I found that quite disturbing, had no idea that sort of thing took place to such an extent.

Sightseek 09-02-2007 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Yes, superstar horses can make fans of people; I just haven't seen enough of "new blood" around the racetrack. And I attend live racing often enough to notice. Since superstar horses race so infrequently now, I do not count on them to be the engine driving people to become racing fans.

My father introduced me to racing, perhaps unwittingly. My appreciation of racing is in the genes, without question. I was studying the racing program at a very young age.

I don't think it is apples and oranges to compare Cigar from the mid-90s to the greats from the mid- to late 70s, actually. I thought that The Bid's post about Cigar not getting Spectacular Bid out of a gallop was terrific. Clearly, The Bid was better, as was Affirmed, and Seattle Slew.

Did you read Steven Crist's article in the DRF this morning of how things have differed from the card of the 1987 Travers?

http://www.drf.com/drfNewsArticle.do...1&subs=0&arc=0

If anyone invents a time machine, I'd like to buy a ticket for one please. :)

Cannon Shell 09-02-2007 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus

What a huge difference between then and now. For breed and racing quality, Then (racing without Lasix) beats Now (running with Lasix, Bute, and steroids) by a mile.

Hate to rain on your parade but Bute and steroids were around in 1987. If you knew what was done to horses then in lieu of Lasix, you would be a big fan of it.

Port Conway Lane 09-02-2007 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miraja2
This is what makes all these comparisons difficult. How can anyone really compare two horses like say..........Ghostzapper and John Henry and determine who was "better"? One guy could point to speed figs and overall winning percentage in races and conclude that Ghostzapper was CLEARLY better. Another could look at number of G1 races won and decide that John Henry was far and away a better horse. Which one is right? It all depends. Personally I would rate John Henry higher than Ghostzapper because he accomplished a lot more. But if the two were to square off in a race on the dirt, I would pick Ghostzapper. It almost seems like this question of who is the "best" is actually two different questions merged into one.
1) Who accomplished the most?
2) Who would win if they all met in a race?

I'm glad someone mentioned him in 6 pages of opinions

Bravado2112 09-03-2007 12:08 AM

Submitted without comment...

All-time Breeders' Cup Classic winning Beyer Figs:

06 - Invasor - 116
05 - Saint Liam - 112
04 - Ghostzapper - 124
03 - Pleasantly Perfect - 119
02 - Volponi - 116
01 - Tiznow - 117
00 - Tiznow - 116
99 - Cat Thief - 118
98 - Awesome Again - 116
97 - Skip Away - 120
96 - Alphabet Soup - 114
95 - Cigar - 117
94 - Concern - 115
93 - Arcangues - 114
92 - A.P. Indy - 114
91 - Black Tie Affair - 120
90 - Unbridled - 116
89 - Sunday Silence (Easy Goer) - 124
88 - Alysheba - 122
87 - Ferdinand - 117
86 - Skywalker - 118
85 - Proud Truth - 120
84 - Wild Again - 113

---------------------------------------

While we're at it. Re-posted from last year:

Cigar
BC Classic - 115
JC Gold Cup - 115
Woodward - 116
Pacific Classic - 111
Arlington - 117
Mass Cap - 112
Donn - 117

BC Classic - 117
JC Gold Cup - 111
Woodward - 111
Hol Gold Cup - 118
Mass Cap - 117
Pim Special - 114
Oaklawn - 121
GP Handicap - 116
Donn - 114
Alw - 108

The Indomitable DrugS 09-03-2007 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bravado2112
84 - Wild Again - 113

If that's correct, that means Princess Rooney ran a 121 Beyer for winning the Breeders Cup Distaff in '84 (by 7 lengths over Life's Magic). As her race, at the same ten furlong distance, went a full second faster than the Classic.

FWIW, Life's Magic won the '85 BC Distaff by 6 1/4 lengths over Lady's Secret. Lady's Secret won the '86 BC Distaff and the coveted title Horse of the Year.

Interesting that the 2nd place finisher of the first two BC Distaffs came back to win the following year.

It's hard to believe that Princess Rooney actually holds the record for fastest Beyer figure in BC Distaff history, and not Inside Information (who ran a 119)

Princess Rooney went 6-for-6 at age two - after an 18 length ALW win at Calder, she made her stakes debut ten days later and won by 12 lengths. From there, she shipped to Belmont and ran in a 13 horse field in the Grade 1 Frizette, which she won by 8 lengths. The 3rd place finisher, Weekend Surprise, was the dam of both Preakness winner Summer Squall and Belmont winner A. P. Indy.

She made her final start of her 2yo season in the Grade 2 Gardenia Stakes, which she won by 11 lengths. The 2nd place finisher in that race had won a Grade 1 stake in her prior start.

Princess Rooney was a Grade 1 winning filly with a perfect 6-for-6 record, winning her six races by a combined 56 lengths, for a 9.33 length average margin of victory. However, she lost champion 2yo filly honors to the deceased Landaluce, who went 5-for-5, also with a single Gr 1 win. She won her five races by a combined 46.5 lengths, for a 9.30 average margin of victory.

I wonder how close the vote was that year?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.