Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Shocking news!!! (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13113)

ArlJim78 05-14-2007 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fearless Leader
YOU should RE-READ them again because it is obvious that YOU have missed the point.

In fact, YOU should RE-READ Steve's posts as well. To his credit, he is intelligent enough to understand my point and replied accordingly. As for the rest of the respondents...the idiotic comments speak for themselves.

Idiotic? Like comparing the handling of Sumwonlovesyou to Teuflesberg?

The Indomitable DrugS 05-14-2007 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
Idiotic? Like comparing the handling of Sumwonlovesyou to Teuflesberg?

I saw that....

While the board owned filly was placed, on form, way over her head in the KEE race....she also had never run on turf, had a right to improve on turf from a pedigree standpoint, and the reality is that there are no N2L claiming races on turf that time of year...so, if you want to run her on the turf at that point, you have to do so in a very tough spot.

After her defeat, she was wisely placed, and ran a nice race.

As far as Teuflesberg goes, there are a lot of soft Grade 3-ish stake races for 3-year-olds, that carry VERY inflated purses---he'd be a lot better served in those races....than getting his butt kicked in Triple Crown series races.

And I'm sure everyone but Fearless Leader knows this---though, he may know this as well.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Count me among those that are skeptical about such offers.

This is the entirety of my posts in this thread other than the title of "shocking news". In my mind it WAS shocking news that they decided on passing the Preakness in light of the comments of Tuefelesbegs trainer which strongly suggested that they were in. As for my other comment, which is quoted above, you seem to have been able to take a whole lot more out of that sentence than anyone else has. I am always willing to stand behind what I say regardless of the popularity or political correctness of it but in this case you seem to be the one taking the shots at me, despite my having said virtually nothing.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fearless Leader
YOU should RE-READ them again because it is obvious that YOU have missed the point.

In fact, YOU should RE-READ Steve's posts as well. To his credit, he is intelligent enough to understand my point and replied accordingly. As for the rest of the respondents...the idiotic comments speak for themselves.

By the way your "point" was that the majority of this thread was commentary by Steve and myself. Since your "point" is so obviously in error being that I made a one sentence comment about the validity of an $3 million dollar offer for the horse, therefore was in no way, shape, or form the "majority" or in fact any comment about the horse or its connections or its placement. If you have a problem with me personally then just say whats on your mind. But as far as this topic or thread, you are way off base.

ArlJim78 05-14-2007 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
I saw that....

While the board owned filly was placed, on form, way over her head in the KEE race....she also had never run on turf, had a right to improve on turf from a pedigree standpoint, and the reality is that there are no N2L claiming races on turf that time of year...so, if you want to run her on the turf at that point, you have to do so in a very tough spot.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. I'm no trainer and I don't pretend to know why Chuck spotted her where he did at Keeneland. However I have seen it happen many times that a trainer will start off with a new aquisition by moving them up into a spot where they can't be claimed away. My thinking is that they are trying to assess what they have, to be able to draw their own conclusions about the horses current class and fitness, and in this case to also check out how the filly took to the grass, and all the while gaining some needed fitness. Whatever the reason was it was validated in the very next outing when she ran her best race to date, still being spotted higher than she ever had in the past I believe. There is just no way that it even remotely compares to Tueflesberg.

You make a very good point about Tueflesberg. Instead of being an alsoran in Gr1 events, there are numerous softer good money spots restricted to 3yo's.

Fearless Leader 05-14-2007 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
By the way your "point" was that the majority of this thread was commentary by Steve and myself. Since your "point" is so obviously in error being that I made a one sentence comment about the validity of an $3 million dollar offer for the horse, therefore was in no way, shape, or form the "majority" or in fact any comment about the horse or its connections or its placement. If you have a problem with me personally then just say whats on your mind. But as far as this topic or thread, you are way off base.


I suggest you RE-READ post #78. By the way, I don't have a problem with you personally, or professionally.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fearless Leader
I think it is ironic that the people on this thread who are most critical of Jamie Sanders are the same wizards who ran a 15000n2l filly in an allowance race at Keeneland. At least her horse has won a cople of stakes and his earnings have far exceeded his acquisition cost. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Members have been suspended and banned for less.

Explain to me how you are not calling me and Steve out with this post especially in light of your other posts. The "wizards" I am assuming to be Steve and myself.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fearless Leader
SB,

My point is merely this: The major portion of the commentary in this thread comes from both yourself and Cannon Shell, bashing Jamie and her management. The point is that she has made several hundred thousand dollars and won some stakes with a horse she paid $9,000 for. Her current overall statistics nonwithstanding, I think it is ethically questionable and somewhat unprofessional for you and Cannon Shell to publically bash her in such a fashion. As for the specific management of your horse, as I am neither charged with her care, nor an investor in her, where or when she races is not my province. However, If you don't appreciate someone commenting on your choices in such a fashion, why do you think it is appropriate to do the same?

Then you call us unethical and unprofessional.

Danzig 05-14-2007 04:26 PM

by the way there merlin, how's the filly doing?

Coach Pants 05-14-2007 04:27 PM

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...86939380985268

Danzig 05-14-2007 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Then you call us unethical and unprofessional.


but not idiotic, he saved that for the rest of us!!:)

i don't imagine i'm helping here....

Danzig 05-14-2007 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants


lmao

pillow, your timing is impeccable.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 04:28 PM

But you have yet shown where I said ANYTHING about ANYTHING! I certainly have thrown no stones at anyone and if anyone lives in a glass house around here it's me because everybody knows who I am.

hoovesupsideyourhead 05-14-2007 04:30 PM

allright ive sat this out enough ..jamie sanders sucks she has one good horse and she will beat that thing to death ..next..unfortunatly tuflesburg is keeping the stable afoat..

SentToStud 05-14-2007 04:34 PM

Hooves has spoken.

Just me or does J Sanders look like she's been tuned up by the entire band a few times?

ArlJim78 05-14-2007 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
But you have yet shown where I said ANYTHING about ANYTHING! I certainly have thrown no stones at anyone and if anyone lives in a glass house around here it's me because everybody knows who I am.

guy just has an axe to grind, I really don't think it was ever really related to this thread, just a pretext to throw some jabs.

Hickory Hill Hoff 05-14-2007 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
guy just has an axe to grind, I really don't think it was ever really related to this thread, just a pretext to throw some jabs.

I think WE know where this Fearless "dude" is coming from...reminds me of some others.....:rolleyes:

milliam 05-14-2007 06:04 PM

Did you or your owners get breeders cup fever with Battle One when he had no shot.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milliam
Did you or your owners get breeders cup fever with Battle One when he had no shot.

I never trained Battle one

milliam 05-14-2007 06:29 PM

I thought you did a great job training that horse but if he had a throat problem you shouldn't have gone.

Cajungator26 05-14-2007 06:36 PM

I'm guessing that some people need to get their eyes checked.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milliam
I thought you did a great job training that horse but if he had a throat problem you shouldn't have gone.

Battle Won's problems were many but throat was not among them

ArlJim78 05-14-2007 06:41 PM

Wow! Chucks fans are coming out of the woodwork.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
First and foremost a trainer who has problems placing his horses.

I have a lot of horses that I would like to place in the care of another trainer

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
This was intended as a joke. I decided I am above smiley faces so I'll just do this instead.

that is the manly thing to do

Cajungator26 05-14-2007 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
This was intended as a joke. I decided I am above smiley faces so I'll just do this instead.

:D :p :D :p

Cajungator26 05-14-2007 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Thud

I miss him too.

milliam 05-14-2007 06:48 PM

I thougt the excuse was a throat infection.

Hickory Hill Hoff 05-14-2007 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
I miss him too.

He's.....

out there....



somewhere..............


............................;)

Cajungator26 05-14-2007 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff
He's.....

out there....



somewhere..............


............................;)

Oh, I know where Mr. CityLights is. ;)

hoovesupsideyourhead 05-14-2007 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milliam
I thougt the excuse was a throat infection.

whats your problem ....unless your jamie fn sanders you should have no beef with cannon..and in the end he didnt write the frigging piece..id guess you dont make it to your 28th post..lol

Coach Pants 05-14-2007 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
whats your problem ....unless your jamie fn sanders you should have no beef with cannon..and in the end he didnt write the frigging piece..id guess you dont make it to your 28th post..lol

It's probably some degenerate truck driver/rodeo enthusiast.

Cannon Shell 05-14-2007 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milliam
I thougt the excuse was a throat infection.

Lung infection. We of course if you had contacted me before the race and told me that we had no shot I would have scratched on the spot.

paisjpq 05-14-2007 07:02 PM

I think this thread has pretty much gone on long enough...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.