Yet you just made three statements that did exactly that. And are very, very angry that someone with far more knowledge than you pointed it out.

You think that answering "the question" about antibiotic overuse is readily answerable on a message board?

Only if we dumb it down to a superficial, shallow, newspaper-sound bite level that you can understand, I suppose :D

:tro:

Tell you what: you pass PhD level courses in immunology, animal & human physiology, and pharmacology, and then you will have the basis to start learning about this subject.

Get back to us then and you can lecture us on how wrong the FDA is, and why.

Not angry, just shocked that you are still trying to convince anyone of anything at all really, from way up on that high horse of yours. You have not answered one question or refuted one argument or utilized any of that massive wealth of knowledge to prove any of what I said incorrect.
Once again you have proven that a real discussion or debate about any topic is completely pointless when you are involved.

Geeshus - just stop posting nonsensical, superficial, shallow blog c.rap and pretending that somehow makes you a medical expert, and further, your ridiculous contention that the scope of those subjects is discussable at a grade school level, and that professionals that refuse to engage you at that ridiculous level are the ones with "zero knowledge". That makes you the joke.

Stick to the immature ad hominem.

So your posting this information was to share with the massive amount of folks in here that meet your qualifications to share in this discussion?
Or was it all just a setup to lead to the above so you could wave your classes around that you may or may not have passed?
One last read for you that might change your opinion of a government agency that I am certain you have never had the 'pleasure' of having to deal with.
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documen...y-brochure.pdf

Geeshus - just stop posting nonsensical, superficial, shallow blog c.rap and pretending that somehow makes you a medical expert, and further, your ridiculous contention that the scope of those subjects is discussable at a grade school level, and that professionals that refuse to engage you at that ridiculous shallow and uneducated level are the ones you immediately label has having "zero knowledge". That makes you the joke.

Stick to the immature ad hominem.

The UCS http://www.ucsusa.org/about/ and the mayo clinic is shallow blog crap, but dailykos and huffington are respected sources in your mind. Pointless.
You are brilliant and everyone else is a moron, though your spelling leaves a bit to be desired.

You thinking that posting a link makes you expert in medicine? That's so cute! :tro:

When have I posted a link to Daily Kos or Huffington Post as a medical linK? Why, never. So what's your point? Do you even have one?

And no, I don't think you are a moron, nor that I am brilliant. I think you don't have a clue about medicine other than what you read on the internet, and I have a degree and licenses in same. Just the facts.

Keep up the ad hominem. Yes, you can attack my spelling any time you want. Whether it is deliberate in a thread solely started as satire (and you don't realize it), or if it's my normally yes, bad, spelling.

So sorry: having bad spelling just doesn't hurt my feelings.

When it backs my argument, and comes from a real source as opposed to some internet rag it certainly helps.
Did someone make you write ad hominen on the chalk board a lot when you were a kid?

Point was you never post anything that is not colored by opnion to back yourself up. Fact free arguing is your style, which is why all threads on this portion of the site just die off, people get bored proving the same point over and over.
I have never passed myself off as anything, just posted an opinion, then found some facts that backed my position, that is how debates are won, in the eyes of the casual observer.
:wf

When the shoe fits, you wear it. And you wear it very well.

I'm glad you think that posting internet articles makes you a medical expert. It's far easier to be a medical expert on an internet list, than in real life ;)

Sorry. Even you must acknowlege that your statement is factually not true. I post plenty of charts, graphs, facts and figures, along with opinion pieces by others.

Maybe it's just that you don't have the ability to discern fact from opinion. You do seem to often confuse the two.

you're a fucl<ing vet. You're not a global climate scientist like you pretended in the other thread. and you are not an expert antibiotic use in humans.

I have a fucl<ing BS in Animal Science. That makes me a scientist just like you.

:tro::tro:

the bitch neuters and spays dogs but somehow acts like she's a doctor of HUMANS.

I have never pretended to be a global climate scientist - what are you smoking?

And yes, I am an expert on antibiotics, and use, and yes, that includes use in animals that are eaten by humans. That's exactly what a DVM confers.

Good for you! That's quite an accomplishment.

Now go read the definition of scientist, because it's not what you think it is.

She's like Dr. Phil but uglier and fatter.

:tro:

No, that's not what I do. Why do you lie? Is that deliberate, or out of ignorance?

BTW, I was a paramedic for 10 years, so yeah, I do know a little about humans. And yes, pharmacology in primates is taught in vet school.

Your anger and ignorance combine to make you look foolish and petty.