Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Sports Bar & Grill (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Top 10 (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32034)

Coach Pants 10-05-2009 05:53 PM

Julio Jones has been in a coma and they are still undefeated. If the sleeping giant wakes up it is over for the competition.

ddthetide 10-05-2009 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
tebow will play. "they" say he's feeling fine.. no headache's.. have a feeling FL will play this one out til gametime so LSU has to prepare for two VERY different QB's.

it's not total UM's call. the doctors have most of the say in this and if he can't practice he won't play.

ddthetide 10-05-2009 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gales0678
don't forget Miami beat OU without their starting QB


every week in college fb brings suprises and

i just don't believe that this 'bama team will go undeafeated , they can still win a bcs title in jan , but i don't think they go unbeaten , better to get the loss out early than late ---we shall see

i said this week would be a loss before the season started. ole miss will play like the #1 team in the country this saturday. the Bama defense is a bit out wack. they gave up a lot of yards last week to uk, that could translate to points for ole miss.

ddthetide 10-05-2009 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Julio Jones has been in a coma and they are still undefeated. If the sleeping giant wakes up it is over for the competition.

JJ is Not doing a good job at working to get open. so far teams are playing over-under zone on him but the OC does need to do a better job of getting him involved. i do like they way GMc spreads the ball around.

SniperSB23 10-06-2009 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gales0678
don't forget Miami beat OU without their starting QB


every week in college fb brings suprises and

i just don't believe that this 'bama team will go undeafeated , they can still win a bcs title in jan , but i don't think they go unbeaten , better to get the loss out early than late ---we shall see

Yes, OU had to play with some bum that took all the way until his second start until he set the school record for TD passes in a game. If he had any talent he would have done it in his first start.

Whether I believe Florida would beat Alabama is irrelevant. I think rankings should be based on what you have done so far, not on what I speculate you could do. And after last weeks results I think Alabama now has the superior resume and should be #1. If Florida wins at LSU this week then they'll have the stronger resume and go back on top. The biggest problem with rankings is people get too focused on where they had a team ranked last week instead of objectively looking at the big picture again every week.

ddthetide 10-06-2009 11:51 AM

i don't think there should be any rankings at all until the middle of october.

horseofcourse 10-06-2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide
i don't think there should be any rankings at all until the middle of october.

why not just go for it all and not rank anyone until the regular season and conference championship games are over?? That would solve everything!!
:D

SniperSB23 10-06-2009 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide
i don't think there should be any rankings at all until the middle of october.

I like rankings cause I could have paid no attention to college football all year and would see #1 Florida at #4 LSU and know it is a huge game. What I don't like is that the pollsters pay too much attention to where they had teams ranked the previous week. They should re-evaluate every team every week instead of just leaving everyone in order except the teams that lost the last week.

horseofcourse 10-06-2009 12:36 PM

1. Florida
2. Boise State
3. LSU
4. Alabama
5. Cincinnati
6. TCU
7. Auburn
8. South Florida
9. Kansas
10. Iowa

timmgirvan 10-06-2009 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horseofcourse
why not just go for it all and not rank anyone until the regular season and conference championship games are over?? That would solve everything!!
:D

what would we have to talk and bitch about??:eek:

King Glorious 10-06-2009 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
I like rankings cause I could have paid no attention to college football all year and would see #1 Florida at #4 LSU and know it is a huge game. What I don't like is that the pollsters pay too much attention to where they had teams ranked the previous week. They should re-evaluate every team every week instead of just leaving everyone in order except the teams that lost the last week.

You can't know it's a huge game by the rankings. Look at Cal. Two Saturday's ago, they were ranked top five in the country. If the Oregon and USC games had been switched around on the calender, it would have looked like a big game. Now, Cal has been blown out 72-6 in back to back games and can't even get a vote for top 25. The rankings would make you think Florida vs. Boise St. is a huge game but realistically, Florida would be favored by 25 in such a matchup.

SniperSB23 10-06-2009 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
You can't know it's a huge game by the rankings. Look at Cal. Two Saturday's ago, they were ranked top five in the country. If the Oregon and USC games had been switched around on the calender, it would have looked like a big game. Now, Cal has been blown out 72-6 in back to back games and can't even get a vote for top 25. The rankings would make you think Florida vs. Boise St. is a huge game but realistically, Florida would be favored by 25 in such a matchup.

They aren't always going to be right, but at least I know it is a big game going in. Opening game in the NFL was Tennessee-Pittsburgh which was a big game at the time. The fact that Pittsburgh is now 2-2 and Tennessee is 0-4 doesn't suddenly take away from my enjoyment of watching the game at the time. It just means I wouldn't be as excited if they played again now.

King Glorious 10-06-2009 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
They aren't always going to be right, but at least I know it is a big game going in. Opening game in the NFL was Tennessee-Pittsburgh which was a big game at the time. The fact that Pittsburgh is now 2-2 and Tennessee is 0-4 doesn't suddenly take away from my enjoyment of watching the game at the time. It just means I wouldn't be as excited if they played again now.

I don't pay attention to the rankings when looking at a game to determine if it's a big game. Florida vs. LSU would be a big game if they were ranked #25 and #30. It would be a bigger game to me than watching #1 BYU vs. #5 TCU. Oklahoma is #19 now. When they get Bradford back and play Texas on 10/17, that's going to be a big game no matter the ranking.

My current Top 10 would be:
Texas
Florida
Alabama
Va. Tech
Miami
USC
Oregon
LSU
Ohio St.
Oklahoma

Crown@club 10-06-2009 12:49 PM

I Remember in the 80's, some columnist from Chicago used to ahve his weekly rankings. He would flip-flop Kansas-Kansas St each week at the top and the rest of the rankings went to whatever conference he picked on that week. So keeping up with tradition, I'm going to go.

1) Washington St
2) Illinois
3) Purdue
4) Indiana
5) Northwestern
6) Minnesota
7) Tie Michigan St, Michigan, Notre Dame
10) Tie Iowa, Wisconsin, Penn St, Ohio St.

SniperSB23 10-06-2009 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
I don't pay attention to the rankings when looking at a game to determine if it's a big game. Florida vs. LSU would be a big game if they were ranked #25 and #30. It would be a bigger game to me than watching #1 BYU vs. #5 TCU. Oklahoma is #19 now. When they get Bradford back and play Texas on 10/17, that's going to be a big game no matter the ranking.

My current Top 10 would be:
Texas
Florida
Alabama
Va. Tech
Miami
USC
Oregon
LSU
Ohio St.
Oklahoma

Of course we know which games are big without having to look at the rankings, rankings aren't necessary for people who actually follow the sport. My point was that I could know a game was a big deal when I see #1 and #4 play even if I hadn't followed college football at all. That is why rankings exist, to draw in fans that might not know what is going on but that know #1 against #4 is a big deal.

King Glorious 10-06-2009 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
Of course we know which games are big without having to look at the rankings, rankings aren't necessary for people who actually follow the sport. My point was that I could know a game was a big deal when I see #1 and #4 play even if I hadn't followed college football at all. That is why rankings exist, to draw in fans that might not know what is going on but that know #1 against #4 is a big deal.

But how would #1 Florida vs. #5 Boise St. be a big deal to anyone when Florida would be favored by 25?

SniperSB23 10-06-2009 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
But how would #1 Florida vs. #5 Boise St. be a big deal to anyone when Florida would be favored by 25?

That game would be a bigger deal to me than any matchup you could put together this season. And there is no way Florida would be favored by 25 points. In Boise the spread would be close.

King Glorious 10-06-2009 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
That game would be a bigger deal to me than any matchup you could put together this season. And there is no way Florida would be favored by 25 points. In Boise the spread would be close.

Florida would crush them. I'd think Florida/Alabama or Oklahoma/Texas or USC/Oregon would be bigger deals than Boise St. vs. anyone.

SniperSB23 10-06-2009 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious
Florida would crush them. I'd think Florida/Alabama or Oklahoma/Texas or USC/Oregon would be bigger deals than Boise St. vs. anyone.

It would be a better game then you are giving it credit for and the underdog story would have people interested. And the spread would not be anywhere near 25 points.

dalakhani 10-06-2009 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
It would be a better game then you are giving it credit for and the underdog story would have people interested. And the spread would not be anywhere near 25 points.

the spread would be double figures any way you cut it. At least 2 touchdowns.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.