Too kind.

Here at The NerdyForum...every night is Dimmy Night.


Perhaps the most outrageous fool who ever feigned living.

I miss Franny's posts...you wouldn't happen to have any pict's of them would you?

!!!!




Ah do!

I also miss Deb's post....maybe a few of them thrown in too?

!!!!


YES!

:p :{>:

BUT..Uhhh what are ya trying to say here Geek?


Pah-leezeeeeeeee are you comparing me to dimmy?

ah, ah..... just don't know what to think....:(

No way.....:{>:

you may have miss my double decker convoluted extra meaning of "posts"

Personally, I would just like this retard to answer a question
 

I dont know how anyone with a brain can support the idea of this moron being vice president. She's clueless. Exhibit 2059 below:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/...062.shtml#ccmm

Her inability to recall any examples of anything not only reveals how little she knows, but also, how terribly the McCain campaign is coaching her.

mccain is going down red necks from down here even dont like the ticket..but..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rPnL...eature=related
:eek:

just watched this. off the top of my head all i could come up with was the dred scott decision and that's not too current. i doubt many here could throw out an answer to that question.

my problem isn't that she doesn't have an answer. it's that she doesn't have a smooth deflection for not having an answer. vice president deer in the headlights.

just thought of another. the segregation decision that brown vs board of education overturned. whatever that was. i'll have to get back to ya.

again, the vision of the beauty queen comes to my mind. 'the iraq'. anyway, she needs to be able to think faster on her feet-and if nothing immediately comes to mind when they ask her if she can think of something, she needs to be able to say no, nothing comes to mind at the moment-not just retreat to the states rights b.s. she was babbling about.
she sounded pretty stupid right there. as for her saying she's a federalist, that belies the whole 'states should be able to decide' part of her argument. someone needs to read their american history books!


oh wait...maybe those were some of the ones she banned.

i didn't like their ruling on eminent domain.

If she was going to make Republicans happy,
she just should have said the basic theme
that the Warren Court wrote so many decisions
that were an example of Judicial activism gone awry.
Then the same old blah, blah, how the Supreme Court
is there to interpret constitutional law not make it... blah, blah..
just like the Republicans always want to hear.

Not that hard to start spewing rhetoric if you have heard it
enough. Has she heard it enough? She is right around my
age so I would suppose she has...

unless she's absolutely lost her confidence i'm sure that's what you'll see in the debate.

i'd say it's a longshot she's spectacular but it's hard to believe she won't be good enough to get tim and jim back posting in this section.

well, maybe not jim. i think he's seen the writing on the wall.

but i'm sure we'll get another drudge report or faux news link explaining how the veep debate changed everything.

Katie should have asked her if she thought women's suffrage should have been decided by individual states.

Okay, this would have been her answer:

ummm, yes katie, as a mayor and a governor and most importantly as a mother and wife i am in a position to understand how much women have suffered over the years. We have to tie this suffering into health care and new jobs...and health care. John McCain and I are mavericks that will make suffering end for all americans in each state.

Sounds about right. Would only be one drink too. I'm playing Drinking Sarah Palin with some friends tonight:

http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...te.html?cat=60

i think 'they' turn her into the sound bite kitten tonight....substance be damned.