Derby Trail Forums
Page 3 of 9 < 12 3 45 > Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Joe Silverio Simulcast Center (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Attention: Members Of Derby Trail ! (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14729)

Past Post 07-02-2007 09:12 PM
Once the group is formed,others will be beating down the door to get inn.It will work,I can tell just by the reaction of some of the members coming on here and saying they want inn.

pgardn 07-02-2007 09:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Ateam, while this is true with most internet boards, not here my friend. I haven't met a single clown on here yet. I would trust every single person I have met on this
The Bid... welched on a bet with Babs....

ONe problems is with good cappers you got very strong opinions. ANd hooves is right about a nightmare. If you could actually sit down face to face I think its possible. But on a board... I'll never forget when hooves and others were questioning Oracle about one of his mortal locks and he said he would eat his DRF if the horse lost.

I dont think Oracle ever actually tasted the newspaper ink.

Lava 07-02-2007 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Again, you have to circuitize it. Something like this would only be worthwhile in California, you probably get about 20 opportunies a year in California for a 1 million dollar pot, if you got 10k as your starting bankroll, you would have 20 $500 tickets....

Now, I wouldn't recommend just doing $500 tickets but it is the idea that you really would only need 10 people at 1k a piece
If you set the bankroll at 10K I would set 1 share at $50 a total of 200 shares and let people buy as many shares as they would like till every share is filled. That would make it so more people can get in on it, also it would make so people can see how it works out before they send more money to the leader. I would not send 1K to someone I have never met, but I would send 50 to 200.

Past Post 07-02-2007 09:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mortyfeatherhands
This is about the stupidest idea I have ever heard of.

From a purely logistical standpoint of course.






Oh it's stupid from any standpoint.

Why not just call out for John Dillinger to hold the money?

Why are there always a few that think everyone is dishonest.Thanks for your opinion. JOHN !

ArlJim78 07-02-2007 09:21 PM
I agree with scavs that California tracks would be the main focus. But there are sometimes other nice carry's, BC day etc.

Mortimer 07-02-2007 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Past Post
Why are there always a few that think everyone is dishonest.Thanks for your opinion. JOHN !



ror!


Get outta heah Dillinger!

The Bid 07-02-2007 09:24 PM
PGD, you dont have a clue what you are talking about welching a hundred dollar bet. Get real you d bag

Scav 07-02-2007 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lava
If you set the bankroll at 10K I would set 1 share at $50 a total of 200 shares and let people buy as many shares as they would like till every share is filled. That would make it so more people can get in on it, also it would make so people can see how it works out before they send more money to the leader. I would not send 1K to someone I have never met, but I would send 50 to 200.
I agree 100%..The one thing is that you couldn't allow anyone to get more then 5% ownership, and you would allow the 3 decision makers to have 10% each, while the other 70% owned by investors, which not one investor would own more then 5%

Lava 07-02-2007 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I agree 100%..The one thing is that you couldn't allow anyone to get more then 5% ownership, and you would allow the 3 decision makers to have 10% each, while the other 70% owned by investors, which not one investor would own more then 5%
You are right.

Past Post 07-02-2007 09:27 PM
I think breeders cup is just around the corner,it could very well be the goal for our future group to attack the track.Lot of dead money on those days.I will welcome anyone who thinks they might want to join in if I can form this group.

Coach Pants 07-02-2007 09:28 PM
If you combined all of the tickets posted today...would it have hit?

Past Post 07-02-2007 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lava
You are right.


Yes,great format.

Past Post 07-02-2007 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
If you combined all of the tickets posted today...would it have hit?

No doubt in my mind that the cappers on this site if the money was there,they would of hit this pick 6 today.Do you agree with me on this Steve ?

Scav 07-02-2007 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
If you combined all of the tickets posted today...would it have hit?
I doubt it, 2nd, 3rd and 6th leg winners were hard IMO

Coach Pants 07-02-2007 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Past Post
No doubt in my mind that the cappers on this site if the money was there,they would of hit this pick 6 today.Do you agree with me on this Steve ?
I don't agree. You'd need a leprechaun or a potato enthusiast to have the 9 in the last.

Scav 07-02-2007 09:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Past Post
No doubt in my mind that the cappers on this site if the money was there,they would of hit this pick 6 today.Do you agree with me on this Steve ?
Pillow's name is Steve?

Scav 07-02-2007 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
I don't agree. You'd need a leprechaun or a potato enthusiast to have the 9 in the last.
The only thing that gets you that 9 is structuring...the only thing

Lava 07-02-2007 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I doubt it, 2nd, 3rd and 6th leg winners were hard IMO
I hit the first 4 legs and had 2nd and 3rd in the last two

Coach Pants 07-02-2007 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Pillow's name is Steve?
It's Teddy. I was just giving my opinion anyways.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM.
Page 3 of 9 < 12 3 45 > Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.