Originally Posted by randallscott35

Anti, the one big exacta that happened was a 3-1 over a 25-1. Those are the ones she needs....not the other way around. The big faves won't get it done for her...

And regarding the sample size...this will easily take a month. 32 in 4 days of busy racing works out to a month easy...Like I said, I'd be willing to go to 350 or 400 but not if its clear cut at 250....[/QUOTE]

you are correct randall, i confused the Total Races So Far--111 for being the sample size. 250 should be a good size

as far as the 3-1 over the 25-1 goes, you are right, those are the ones she needs. which is funny because those are the ones she wouldnt play. also i believe she said for the bet to be made it would have to be a 20-1 shot or higher.. anyways this is a very good study and good luck to both. I am thinking about going though a few months of races to find out the percentage that heavy favorites win at compared to "favorites"

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

The ones she needs are the ones she doesn't play---in a nut shell, that is why in real life her method makes even less sense....But I didn't mean to start this in this thread---just a joke with Grits, should've put it in the main thread--carry on.