These one trick ponies need a new song to sing...this one is old and tired :o

Is there ONE Hillary supporter that can explain WHY they do?

*She is physically incapable of holding the office.
*She is an unindicted felon, per the FBI's own admission.
*She has sold the security and sovereignty of the nation for her own personal gain.

And that is just the personal attributes that disqualify her.

What is she going to do for you?

Well - She has not mentioned how she is going to deal with the 20 TRILLION dollar national debt once. Not Once.

But she has disclosed her Tax Plan:

Which is basically a regurgitation of the Obama nightmare where they just keep redefining what "Middle Class" is - to the point that now anyone with a job - any job, is officially *Middle Class* and subject to Federal taxes.

Now - if you happen to be one of the fortunate ones that makes $3,000.00 A MONTH - Then you are NO LONGER MIDDLE CLASS AND ARE NOW INDEED WEALTHY, thus subjected to the 25% tax bracket.

But let's be honest... when you are pulling down that kinda dough, who is going to miss a few extra thousand bucks a year, am I right? I mean $690.00 a week is crazy money.

She has no vision or plan to grow jobs. None.

But look at the bright side - if you pull down 36K a year, you are officially RICH!!! :zz:

I can't speak for liberals, but I think most of us know that we need to work on immigration reform.
melania is getting attention because of the comments made by her idiot husband regarding people coming here illegally...and that there is potentially an issue with her immigration history. so, of course it'll be covered.

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1...pitched-sunday

funny. but not worth losing your job...

We need a liberal consensus board to determine when and what freedom of speech is - like when someone says something that someone else might not like, then there is a "instant Replay Review Board" that can rule on it.

Cuz it sure seems like this opinion could change with one's mood.

Freedom of speech? Not many companies would tolerate an employee publically humiliating another employee. Regardless of what you think of Chapman. This isn't a freedom of speech issue.

So - dude chokes his girlfriend out, blasts off 8 rounds from a hand gun, gets off because the abusee doesn't press charges and all is washed away until....until....about 6 seconds of this INCREDIBLY INSENSITIVE (The Cubs words) song was played over the intercom...

I'd hate to think how this poor, poor snowflake was "Publicly Humiliated" by all of this, but a reprimand would have sufficed. At least it would have prior to the ground swell of this Pussification Movement.

Keep on banging the SJW drum. This country is so fuc1<ed.

Why plenty of Donald Trump supporters will believe that Hillary Clinton stole the election..:zz:


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...nZg?li=BBnb7Kz

And our constitution is to prevent government overreach. Does not apply to sports teams.

Yawn. Hey tough guy. Sorry to confuse you by stating the reality of the situation rather than what you want to hear or what I even agree is "right thing to do". There is no freedom of speech in the workplace and there never has been. If you don't agree try it for yourself tomorrow at work. I'm sure there is someone there you think is an *******. Send out a global email making that point.


http://www.hrexaminer.com/is-there-free-speech-at-work/

https://youtu.be/UlOrk5iUG1s

Sympathy for the children.

Sorry to have caused this much confusion and distress, tough guy, but I was agreeing with Danzig's original point... I was speaking colloquially (look it up if you need to, but I'm certain you don't).

I believe most of us have mastered the Constitutional limits of freedom of speech long ago, (yelling fire in a crowded movie house, yada, yada)... thus doesn't protect someone from maligning their employer or causing damage to their employer's business/image/reputation.

But thanks for clearing that up not once, but twice.

The point (which was apparently missed) was in the past, everyone involved would have had a good laugh over it proceeded by a slap on the wrist and a reprimand to not do it again.

Instead we have SJW bloggers in full meltdown, a MLB franchise apologizing (for being insensitive, no less), and an employee fired.

Welcome to the 21st Century.

Sorry I can't discern when you are being sarcastic or publicly melting down. Seeing far more of the later than the former as of late so I followed the trend.

Professional Sports are a big part of "the system".

That's why I've focused on Premier League instead of American professional sports.

I don't have to be bombarded with the propaganda considering I don't have the political narrative of the Premier League bombarded upon me by ESPN and the other propaganda outlets of the Democratic Party.

Much easier to enjoy the sport this way.

Plus the events typically don't last 3-5 hours.

F.uck American Professional sports.

North Carolina to Schools: Do not refer to students as "Boys and Girls"

Introducing the "Gender Unicorn" to help teachers explain issues like gender identity and gender expression:



No, this is not an Onion piece...

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/...and-girls.html

How come there is a Jesus Fish between their legs?

Kind looks like crabs

:tro:

From snopes.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/08/15/cha...nder-entirely/

The fox piece saying anything goes into effect is, like a lot of fox crap fox stuff, not true. There is no mandate, no rules to use this.

More examples of the Liberal Media for sure

What a POS...Here is the liberal media at it's finest..I agree!! We should be ashamed

http://www.toddstarnes.com/

Good to see Hillary standing by his si.......ooooooh...wait... nope, she's on her stool again. #HillaryStools :o

WOW!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifIAlft47bM

trump rails against the media.

hires media man to manage campaign.

smh

Karma for Kathleen Kane?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/16/us...eral.html?_r=0

Previously...
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/us...e=article&_r=0

Otherwise known as the vetting process for Dems.....Separates the contenders from the pretenders. Sorry Kath, hone those skills in prison and try again when you get out.

good riddance.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...6a13?section=&

when I saw Aetna was leaving most exchanges, I figured, here we go....more issues with obamacare that were foreseen from day one.
but, of course there's more to it.

I read yesterday that Aetna just a few months ago was bragging about how well they were doing, were staying in all exchanges. and then they announced the other day they were getting out of most, and the article questioned if it was due to the hiccup with the humana merger. well, now there's proof.

Yeah, so, there's an Obamacare thread for this, if you could use that, it'd be really great... old news actually, and hardly a facepalm but whatevah

No worries. The inventors of this flaming bag of **** say they have a few ideas about how to fix it.

yeah...I have complete faith

This is funny. Open it up and there was an ADHD ad before the video started.

Princeton to remove "man" from official school material:

* The word “actress” should be replaced by “actor.”

* A “cameraman” must now be called a “camera operator.”

* There will be no more references to a “cleaning lady,” but instead an “office cleaner.”

* New students are no longer “freshmen” but rather “first-year students.”

* A “mailman” no longer delivers letters or packages, because that’s the work now of a “mail carrier,” “letter carrier” or “postal worker.”

* Nothing is to ever be done for the betterment of “mankind” but instead for “humanity,” “human kind” or simply “people.”

* A “waiter” or “waitress” will no longer dish out grub, as that’s now the work of a “server.”

* An “average man” is now an “average person” or “ordinary person.”

and on and on and on....

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/19...-material.html

This is CNN.

By all means, free college for all.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9lmvX00TLY


(and they vote)

I could only watch 2 minutes.. Can you give me the Cliff Notes version of what the heck this was?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-advances.html

What a frivolous lawsuit from a NeoCon pundit.

Look this woman dated or is still dating Dave Navarro. She's a strong lady and has been verbally "assaulted" far worse than that. She needs to take a lie detector test to see if she's fibbing or as Lochte says...OVER-EXAGGERATED.

Then again I like seeing the Murdochs **** themselves.

Carry on, horrible people. Even though this is another case in point of removing the heterosexual man from the mainstream media. Fox will be forced to hire a poofter or a woman to right the ship.

It's ART, man!

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/interior-semiotics