Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Life at Ten (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39282)

Princess Doreen 11-05-2010 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 717355)
I really don't think it's that easy for JV. Opt not to ride for your #1 employer in a two million dollar race? Should have he called the vet over, yes. Do I think he would have rode her if she/he was in some sort of danger, no. He really never seemed to urge/get in to her either. He was in a no win situation. Also, Pletcher knew there was an issue in the paddock and I'm sure he watched her very carefully warming up. If anyone should get the blame IMO it is him.

Once a jock is on the horse, the honus is on him. They all just better pray to whomever they pray to that nothing goes wrong with her as a result of running her around that track. My heart breaks for her. First and foremost - it's always the horse that's top priority. Pletcher didn't do right and neither did Johnny V.

Rileyoriley 11-05-2010 09:50 PM

Alot of people dropped the ball on this one.:(

hockey2315 11-05-2010 09:52 PM

I tried to call someone in Europe who has Betfair when this went down, but to no avail.

It's really a disgrace. As soon as JV said something on national TV it was going to be a disaster no matter what. Can you imagine what would have happened if she had broken down? It was just terrible to watch as someone who doesn't want to see a horse in distress and as a bettor. I don't buy the lights excuse either. . . that's obviously a cop out. I hope there's a big time backlash from this.

Linny 11-05-2010 09:54 PM

Is the ESPN coverage available online now? The Borel fight was posted 5 minutes after the event but I can't find the ESPN pre-race coverage of the Distaff anywhere.

FGFan 11-05-2010 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny (Post 717369)
Is the ESPN coverage available online now? The Borel fight was posted 5 minutes after the event but I can't find the ESPN pre-race coverage of the Distaff anywhere.


Don't know if pre-race is online but she looked terrible in the post parade and JV looked very concerned.

To note, JV did asked for and received a vet check and she cleared to go, well that's what they reported on ESPN after the race was over.

hoovesupsideyourhead 11-05-2010 09:57 PM

that horse was higher than lil wayne..allday scurries away under the lights..

NoLuvForPletch 11-05-2010 09:59 PM

From THE BLOODHORSE
 
Dr. Larry Bramlage, on-call veterinarian for the American Association of Equine Practitioners, said in a statement that the 5-year-old mare was examined prior to entering the starting gate by a team of three vets that "did not observe any physical problems.

"She was examined again after the race and again no physical problems were observed. A more in-depth examination will be conducted this evening and tomorrow," the statment read

HaloWishingwell 11-05-2010 10:00 PM

The best Pletcher can do is tell Velazquez is to warm her up well? That idiot should have given specific orders.....if she doesnt feel right to order a scratch from the vet. Pletcher knew he was sending dogmeat to the track and just sat back and watched. He is the trainer of the horse and responsible for her well being. Today TAP stands for Totally Arrogant Prick

Princess Doreen 11-05-2010 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoLuvForPletch (Post 717375)
Dr. Larry Bramlage, on-call veterinarian for the American Association of Equine Practitioners, said in a statement that the 5-year-old mare was examined prior to entering the starting gate by a team of three vets that "did not observe any physical problems.

"She was examined again after the race and again no physical problems were observed. A more in-depth examination will be conducted this evening and tomorrow," the statment read

\

Who examined her - Stevie Wonder? Jeez, seeing the sweat pouring off her and her mincing steps as they were leading her off the track. She barely did more than a walk around that track. That sweat was stress from pain.

Idiots!

MaTH716 11-05-2010 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HaloWishingwell (Post 717377)
The best Pletcher can do is tell Velazquez is to warm her up well? That idiot should have given specific orders.....if she doesnt feel right to order a scratch from the vet. Pletcher knew he was sending dogmeat to the track and just sat back and watched. He is the trainer of the horse and responsible for her well being. Today TAP stands for Totally Arrogant Prick

I agree that Pletcher is probably the biggest fall guy here. But based on your scenario (and I'm guessing that Chuck would probably be able to answer this). Assuming you feel that the horse is in no real danger, do you ask the owners what they want to do in this spot? They are at the gate of what will probably be the biggest race of their lives and you're really not sure what, if anything is really wrong with her. She's been training/acting great all week, maybe it's just the lights. Could the owners have said, we're here and let's just run her?

Linny 11-05-2010 10:09 PM

A vet at the gate is probably looking for unsoundness but LAT was not unsound. She appeared to be sick, not lame.
When she was led back after being unsaddled, she was blowing HARD even though she had just jogged across the line. She looked like she'd just set a track record.

FGFan 11-05-2010 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Princess Doreen (Post 717384)
\

Who examined her - Stevie Wonder? Jeez, seeing the sweat pouring off her and her mincing steps as they were leading her off the track. She barely did more than a walk around that track. That sweat was stress from pain.

Idiots!

Or an allergic reaction as has been mentioned.
Initial cbc/smac would have only taken 20 mins or so to run, possibly can show allergic reaction but not alway. Will have to wait, I guess, for more test results.

FGFan 11-05-2010 10:13 PM

I don't have the pp's in front of me, but don't remember noting that she was first time lasix, was she?

Ronnie 11-05-2010 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny (Post 717292)
"I would love to know how much money was bet on her in all of the pools combined. Those thieves took the public's money like a stimulus bill."


Not just tickets on LAT in question. My friend and I played a tri and super based on a potentially sharp pace. We were at a simulcast and didn't get to see or hear the pre race because we were in line to bet. Our bet assumed that LAT would be involved in the pace and set up a kickers race. When LAT looked like an old lesson horse out of the gate we were both stunned. When the splits were posted we knew we were in deep weeds. When Acoma was sitting third, I was cooked.
Whether betting on her or against her, people playing the race had the right to fit and sound participants. Everyone in all the pools in that race had to have figured a 7/2 mare with high early speed as a factor in the race, even if they bet against her.
As a multi-race player, I had no way to know before the prior races that there was concern about Life At Ten.


Right but if LAT was scratched the result would have been the same.
I agree with you though that this does affect handicapping of the race of course.

edit: except the pools of course.

MaTH716 11-05-2010 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FGFan (Post 717402)
I don't have the pp's in front of me, but don't remember noting that she was first time lasix, was she?

no

RockHardTen1985 11-05-2010 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 717355)
I really don't think it's that easy for JV. Opt not to ride for your #1 employer in a two million dollar race? Should have he called the vet over, yes. Do I think he would have rode her if she/he was in some sort of danger, no. He really never seemed to urge/get in to her either. He was in a no win situation. Also, Pletcher knew there was an issue in the paddock and I'm sure he watched her very carefully warming up. If anyone should get the blame IMO it is him.

Agree, and it goes both ways... If I remember correctly Noble Causeway was OK.

Ronnie 11-05-2010 10:17 PM

I wasn't really paying attention at that point but didn't they say on ESPN that the lights were bothering her?

Princess Doreen 11-05-2010 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 717410)
Agree, and it goes both ways... If I remember correctly Noble Causeway was OK.

He raced a week later with another jockey and got pulled up on the first turn.

The Indomitable DrugS 11-05-2010 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronnie (Post 717412)
I wasn't really paying attention at that point but didn't they say on ESPN that the lights were bothering her?

Very early on one of the commentators suggested that.

Pletcher is not to blame for anything.

He thought she was "quiet" and "almost sedated looking" while being saddled. Big deal. Are trainers supposed to order horses scratched because of how they have behave in the saddling area?

ESPN showed a picture of her being saddled - and both Johnny V and a handler were both petting her and playfully smacking her shoulder to try and wake her up.

The first problem was when she got on the racetrack and first tried to refuse to warm up - than stumbled a few times in her warm up.

The second problem was when Johnny V. is telling the ESPN guys she's not warming up well at all.

The third problem was five minutes later - when the camera came back to Life At Ten and Bailey asked Johnny V. if she's doing any better and Johnny V. tells ESPN "No. Not really." Bailey asks what's wrong - and all Johnny V. says is "I'm not sure"

Linny 11-05-2010 10:27 PM

I was 5 feet from this mare in the paddock at SAR before the Personal Ensign and she was NUTSO. She's a very hot type, always tugging the handlers, usually led by 2 people. Today she looked like my friends old chestnut lesson horse out there, inspite of the crowds, the noise the lights etc. He placid demeanor was obviously a sign to Pletcher and she ran like a sick horse.

As for the betting, any 'capper had to factor her in, whether as a win candidate or a pace factor.

Are KY rules the same as NY for multi race bets? Do you get the post time favorite in the event of a scratch? If so you wouldn't have gained anything because Blind Luck was (IMO)hurt by the non effort by LAT. The "real" LAT would have assured a far faster pace, making Blind Luck's chances better.

Princess Doreen 11-05-2010 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 717414)
Very early on one of the commentators suggested that.

Pletcher is not to blame for anything.

He thought she was "quiet" and "almost sedated looking" while being saddled. Big deal. Are trainers supposed to order horses scratched because of how they have behave in the saddling area?

ESPN showed a picture of her being saddled - and both Johnny V and a handler were both petting her and playfully smacking her shoulder to try and wake her up.

The first problem was when she got on the racetrack and first tried to refuse to warm up - than stumbled a few times in her warm up.

The second problem was when Johnny V. is telling the ESPN guys she's not warming up well at all.

The third problem was five minutes later - when the camera came back to Life At Ten and Bailey asked Johnny V. if she's doing any better and Johnny V. tells ESPN "No. Not really." Bailey asks what's wrong - and all Johnny V. says is "I'm not sure"

With all of those warning signals, JV should have made the decision to dismount. Did he really think he was going to win or hit the board with a horse that was growing worse as the seconds ticked by?

This is mind boggling. I wonder what kind of inquiries are being made about this.

I would have thought a whole lot better would come from both TAP and JV when presented with a situation like this.

Arletta 11-05-2010 10:33 PM

She was treated very unfair and that is what pisses me off. Pletcher should know his own damn horse and if she is acting out of sorts or not..If they were that concerned about it (and both appeared to be) then there should have never been any other decision than to scratch her. They are lucky she did'nt have a heart attack running in that race.

Plus, how in the hell would lights cause a horse to be subdued and gimpy like she was? That to me is a total crock of crap.

The Indomitable DrugS 11-05-2010 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arletta (Post 717434)
She was treated very unfair and that is what pisses me off. Pletcher should know his own damn horse and if she is acting out of sorts or not..If they were that concerned about it (and both appeared to be) then there should have never been any other decision than to scratch her.

You're talking about a trainer scratching a horse while 3/1 in a $2 million race beacuse she's quiet in the saddling area?

Pletcher leaves the discussion once Life At Ten hits the track. He doesn't even watch the warm-up or post parade - after he saddles the horse he goes to some room to watch the race.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Arletta (Post 717434)
They are lucky she did'nt have a heart attack running in that race.

Life At Ten is classy speed horse - she ran her opening quarter mile in 28.84 seconds - I haven't made my pace figures yet ... but she didn't run fast enough to have a heart attack.

The slowest horse on the backside of Penn National would have been in front of her.

MaTH716 11-05-2010 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny (Post 717421)
I was 5 feet from this mare in the paddock at SAR before the Personal Ensign and she was NUTSO. She's a very hot type, always tugging the handlers, usually led by 2 people. Today she looked like my friends old chestnut lesson horse out there, inspite of the crowds, the noise the lights etc. He placid demeanor was obviously a sign to Pletcher and she ran like a sick horse.

As for the betting, any 'capper had to factor her in, whether as a win candidate or a pace factor.

Are KY rules the same as NY for multi race bets? Do you get the post time favorite in the event of a scratch? If so you wouldn't have gained anything because Blind Luck was (IMO)hurt by the non effort by LAT. The "real" LAT would have assured a far faster pace, making Blind Luck's chances better.

Yeah I guess the pace would have been a bit faster, but from what I remember, with exception of the Stall's horse in the first no one really came from out of the clouds all day. I don't think you wanted to be on the lead or on the rail either, but somewhere near that front pack in the middle of he track.

Rileyoriley 11-05-2010 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 717444)
You're talking about a trainer scratching a horse while 3/1 in a $2 million race beacuse she's quiet in the saddling area?

Pletcher leaves the discussion once Life At Ten hits the track. He doesn't even watch the warm-up or post parade - after he saddles the horse he goes to some room to watch the race.




Life At Ten is classy speed horse - she ran her opening quarter mile in 28.84 seconds - I haven't made my pace figures yet ... but she didn't run fast enough to have a heart attack.

The slowest horse on the backside of Penn National would have been in front of her.

I have to disagree with you. A GOOD trainer would be concerned if his horse wasn't acting normally and WOULD watch her warm up in the post parade.

The Indomitable DrugS 11-05-2010 10:48 PM

Unrivalled Belle was not losing that race to anyone - she rated off of the pace ... so had the real version of Life At Ten showed up .. it wouldn't have helped Blind Luck any.

Unrivalled Belle simply ran back to that rapid win she had in her only other career start over the track when she edged out Rachel Alexandra.

The Indomitable DrugS 11-05-2010 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rileyoriley (Post 717452)
I have to disagree with you. A GOOD trainer would be concerned if his horse wasn't acting normally and WOULD watch her warm up in the post parade.

So, Pletcher isn't a "GOOD" trainer?

What's he going to do - sprint onto the racetrack and use his body as a human shield to prevent his horse from being able to load into stall #1??

If the blame is on anyone - it's on the jockey and or vet.

Rileyoriley 11-05-2010 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 717460)
So, Pletcher isn't a "GOOD" trainer?

What's he going to do - sprint onto the racetrack and use his body as a human shield to prevent his horse from being able to load into stall #1??

If the blame is on anyone - it's on the jockey and or vet.

A GOOD trainer would have given explicit instructions to his jockey that if the horse did not warm up well or didn't seem right to bring it to the vet's attention. This is not the first time this jockey has been on her. He knows how she warms up and he was obviously concerned about her.

v j stauffer 11-05-2010 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 717454)
Unrivalled Belle was not losing that race to anyone - she rated off of the pace ... so had the real version of Life At Ten showed up .. it wouldn't have helped Blind Luck any.

Unrivalled Belle simply ran back to that rapid win she had in her only other career start over the track when she edged out Rachel Alexandra.

I agree

Indian Charlie 11-05-2010 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by v j stauffer (Post 717473)
I agree

She showed the speed of Ruffian.

v j stauffer 11-05-2010 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie (Post 717477)
She showed the speed of Ruffian.

I agree

Indian Charlie 11-05-2010 11:04 PM

Sharp post.

Coach Pants 11-05-2010 11:05 PM

Is Tyler off the wagon again?

Arletta 11-05-2010 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS (Post 717444)
You're talking about a trainer scratching a horse while 3/1 in a $2 million race beacuse she's quiet in the saddling area?

Pletcher leaves the discussion once Life At Ten hits the track. He doesn't even watch the warm-up or post parade - after he saddles the horse he goes to some room to watch the race.

He was not in a room.. He was standing right there at the rail. They were even questioning him about it while they were heading to the gate and he said she didn't seem like "normal".

As far as running slow/fast that was'nt my point. My point was that because of her being in such distress, could have caused her to have a heart attack being asked to go run her a$$ off.

It was all in poor judgment on all parties and I just hope there are no lasting effects from her being made to run tonight.

dagolfer33 11-05-2010 11:14 PM

I have a serious question for Vic. Why do you think A. Quinonez didnt get to retain any of the mounts he could have carried into the BC? His name shows up in the PPs as the last rider for a number of horses, and I think he has done some great riding this year.

FGFan 11-05-2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arletta (Post 717496)
He was not in a room.. He was standing right there at the rail. They were even questioning him about it while they were heading to the gate and he said she didn't seem like "normal".

As far as running slow/fast that was'nt my point. My point was that because of her being in such distress, could have caused her to have a heart attack being asked to go run her a$$ off.

It was all in poor judgment on all parties and I just hope there are no lasting effects from her being made to run tonight.

All that was the post race interview not prior to the race.

The Indomitable DrugS 11-05-2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arletta (Post 717496)
He was not in a room.. He was standing right there at the rail. They were even questioning him about it while they were heading to the gate and he said she didn't seem like "normal".

If you watched the telecast - he came out of his room and back to the rail to get a look at Life At Ten because he was concerned with how she was warming up on tv - that's what Jay Privman said when he ran him down to interview him.

Again - what's he supposed to do - run onto the track and demand they scratch the horse? It's not in his hands at that point.

Arletta 11-05-2010 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FGFan (Post 717499)
All that was the post race interview not prior to the race.

I saw them interviewing him right there at the rail PRIOR to the race while the horse went in front of him.

FGFan 11-05-2010 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arletta (Post 717505)
I saw them interviewing him right there at the rail PRIOR to the race while the horse went in front of him.

After the race.

v j stauffer 11-05-2010 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dagolfer33 (Post 717498)
I have a serious question for Vic. Why do you think A. Quinonez didnt get to retain any of the mounts he could have carried into the BC? His name shows up in the PPs as the last rider for a number of horses, and I think he has done some great riding this year.

Sadler was not overly happy with his ride on Tell a Kelly in the Oak Leaf. Bigger reason though was he wanted a rider who's more familiar with Churchill Downs.

As for Switch. Sadler thinks Rosario is better than Quinonez and gave him the best possible chance. John is very refreshing in that way. He's very frank and honest about that kind of stuff. He pulls no punches. If an agent can't deal with that he can't ride for Sadler.

I know Alonso was disapointed when Richard's Kid skipped the classic to point for Dubai. Not a big shock there he's Arab owned.

Were there others?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.