Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Pletcher BC positive; Hearing pending (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26576)

CSC 12-05-2008 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
LOL

Kapets is right though.. antibiotics dont seem too much like performance enhancing drugs. Maybe Chuck can weigh in.

Let's go back to this point, Steve has stated that it is more to do with sloppiness and not cheating for this one particular incident.

The question for me is I have seen more than my share of "previously trained by" comments in the form and we all know he still has a pretty powerful stable. But he's lost quite a few owners, Melnyk for one. Which again the question to me is why? I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, but I don't believe enough of the news media has made light of this. I'm sure I'm not the only one wondering what is happening here? If anything...

P.S For a time every owner it seemed was flocking to him, now they can't seem to get away fast enough.

Honu 12-05-2008 01:21 PM

He needs to start firing his Asst. Trainers and hiring one's that keep track of what meds each horse is on and withdrawl time . I know Todd cant be at all his barns at once so the people he has running the show for him dont seem to be very competant. I know there have been times when I have screwed up and gave a horse something not knowing it was entered in a race and have went with my head hung low and told the boss right away , believe me I felt like an azz for not knowing the horse was in , but regardless I had to tell him and suffer the azz chewin. This man trains some of the best horses there are and his clients deserve the most able people too do the job , its pretty clear that the Asst. are not doing thier jobs . I mean how hard is it to say hey boss we treated that filly with penicillian cream for her cracked heals or whatever the case may be and we arent sure if she will clear do you want to have her urine tested to make sure. Its very simple to avoid a bad test if people are on top of things and honest.

Kasept 12-05-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Has Barry Irwin been quoted yet as saying that this was an accidental positive?

LOL.. Golf clap...

Payson Dave 12-05-2008 01:32 PM

Not sure who he has on the west coast but TP has some extremely capable assistants.....His man Tristan, at Saratoga this past spring/summer/fall is very good...

Honu 12-05-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payson Dave
Not sure who he has on the west coast but TP has some extremely capable assistants.....His man Tristan, at Saratoga this past spring/summer/fall is very good...


They may very well be good horse trainers but with as many positives as this man gets there is alot of miscommunication going on somewhere. I think The Asst. would be the first place to look.

Payson Dave 12-05-2008 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honu
They may very well be good horse trainers but with as many positives as this man gets there is alot of miscommunication going on somewhere. I think The Asst. would be the first place to look.



how many has he had in say the last three years????

Kasept 12-05-2008 01:57 PM

Ray Paulick indicates that the Pletcher stable believes Wait a While was treated with procaine G penicillin 18 days before the Breeders’ Cup for a resperatory infection.

Honu 12-05-2008 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payson Dave
how many has he had in say the last three years????


I dont know dude but didnt he get an eclipse award 2 years ago after serving a suspension?

parsixfarms 12-05-2008 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Has Barry Irwin been quoted yet as saying that this was an accidental positive?

He only uses trainers above reproach. That's why he's been sending a number of his SoCal horses to John Sadler.

hockey2315 12-05-2008 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payson Dave
Not sure who he has on the west coast but TP has some extremely capable assistants.....His man Tristan, at Saratoga this past spring/summer/fall is very good...

Losing Benzel seems like it's had an effect on him, though. . .

Payson Dave 12-05-2008 02:26 PM

Seth ...after a little bit of a slow start... is certainly now doing pretty well...

but.... I'm thinking that TP took the Training title at Saratoga this past meet and that was after Seth had gone on his own

Linny 12-05-2008 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
Let's go back to this point, Steve has stated that it is more to do with sloppiness and not cheating for this one particular incident.

The question for me is I have seen more than my share of "previously trained by" comments in the form and we all know he still has a pretty powerful stable. But he's lost quite a few owners, Melnyk for one. Which again the question to me is why? I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, but I don't believe enough of the news media has made light of this. I'm sure I'm not the only one wondering what is happening here? If anything...

P.S For a time every owner it seemed was flocking to him, now they can't seem to get away fast enough.

He has lost several owners and some are using him less eclusively but without knowing the owners' reasons it's hard to pin it on one caus. Maybe those trainers who supported him when he started didn't like the vast increase in the size of his operation. Some may have preferred different assistant trainers and others may have chosen not to stay on as Todd's day rate increased. There are alot of reasons to move from one trainer to another.
I do think that Seth was a great assistant. He is methodical and has a head like an encyclopedia. I cannot imagine that losing him didn't hurt Todd. I don't know Tristan so I can't make any comparision but losing Seth couldn't have been good.

For a guy who's clients can't get away fast enough, he sure has alot of horses.

hockey2315 12-05-2008 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payson Dave
Seth ...after a little bit of a slow start... is certainly now doing pretty well...

but.... I'm thinking that TP took the Training title at Saratoga this past meet and that was after Seth had gone on his own

Actually, Kiaran took the training title this past meet with 17 wins from 62 starts. Pletcher was second with 15 wins from 103 starts. Of the 12 trainers with the most wins, Pletcher had the second worst winning percentage (14.56%) only behind Contessa's dismal 7.5%.

Payson Dave 12-05-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315
Actually, Kiaran took the training title this past meet with 17 wins from 62 starts. Pletcher was second with 15 wins from 103 starts. Of the 12 trainers with the most wins, Pletcher had the second worst winning percentage (14.56%) only behind Contessa's dismal 7.5%.


my bad....you are correct.....

Riot 12-05-2008 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept
Ray Paulick indicates that the Pletcher stable believes Wait a While was treated with procaine G penicillin 18 days before the Breeders’ Cup for a resperatory infection.

Very well could have been. That formulation is given intramuscularly, and it could have been slowly metabolized.

Wow. An antibiotic positive.

Snore.

Riot 12-05-2008 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man
The dude had some of the best clients around and was/is juicing. What else is there to say?

Any doubt he was juicing during his 'glory' period?

Another cheater.


How many violations has Pletcher had over his career?

Let's see - a mepivicaine positive in an amount so tiny, that the next year the amount of his "positive" became an allowable level.

And this antibiotic positive.

Please share what you have on Pletcher regarding his being a juicing cheater.

Riot 12-05-2008 04:07 PM

Someone just notified me privately of a story that could be breaking about Pletcher, from the Keeneland fall meet.

This person sez people are going back and looking at all available footage that could possibly shed some light.

This rumor, if true, would be a far bigger Pletcher story than a penicillin positive.

The rumor is ... that in the Keeneland paddock, during the fall meet, Pletcher wore a $200 five-fold silk tie ... in a double windsor knot!


Oh. My. Gawd.

Payson Dave 12-05-2008 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot
How many violations has Pletcher had over his career?

Let's see - a mepivicaine positive in an amount so tiny, that the next year the amount of his "positive" became an allowable level.

And this antibiotic positive.

Please share what you have on Pletcher regarding his being a juicing cheater.



Thanks...I was pretty sure TAP didn't have much of a rap sheet

GBBob 12-05-2008 04:28 PM

and Michael Wrona thought he was being slandered by Bogey...

Danzig 12-05-2008 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus
Has Barry Irwin been quoted yet as saying that this was an accidental positive?

probably the same saboteur who hit jones. :rolleyes:

TalkToTheHoof 12-05-2008 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms
With the new drug rules that the Breeders' Cup put in place earlier this year, if this finding is upheld, would it mean that Pletcher is ineligible to participate in next year's Breeders' Cup?

As reported in one of the Paulick Reports, the BC currently only has sanctions against trainers whose horses test positive for anabolic steroids -- no other substances -- per Pam Blatz-Murff, Sr. VP of Racing for the BC.

So, Pletcher's eligibility to participate in next year's BC should not be affected, assuming of course, that he has a horse that qualifies. ;)

Danzig 12-05-2008 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob
and Michael Wrona thought he was being slandered by Bogey...

good point.

and i almost gagged when i read the assman might get the eclipse.

Cannon Shell 12-05-2008 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
Hmmm... I'm stumped. Back to the drawing board.


Thanks for clarifying- I have the utmost respect for KMc, by the way. One of the few high % trainers I am 98% sure is not utilizing illegal chemistry.

Dont make assumptions about who is and isnt "juicing". You would be surprised by some of the names that never appear in the papers and seemingly get a pass....

Cannon Shell 12-05-2008 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
We know Chuck doesn't cheat...look at his win %. :)

It's a joke, don't blast me for that anyone.

I am going to start cheating next year...look for a better % in 09

Cannon Shell 12-05-2008 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Watson
i will guess 235. :D

I wish:wf

Scav 12-05-2008 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Watson
i will guess 235. :D

maybe 8th grade

Cannon Shell 12-05-2008 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scav
maybe 8th grade

Hey when i was working for jerkens i was right around 210.

And I dont mean to sound harsh but it is really hard to tell who is "cheating" by positives. Most of the real "cheating" is done with substances that dont have tests or the authorities dont know exist. Some guys are pretty brazen and those arent hard to assume. However there are others that would make your head would spin that have done some really shady things.

The current Pletcher positive is a case of murky rules and poor judgement. I have no idea why they would use PP that close since everyone knows (vets) that it lingers and everyone (especially vets and trainers) is supposed to know that the BC horses are "super" tested for hundreds of substances instead of the typical 10 -20.

Dr. Watson 12-05-2008 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I am going to start cheating next year...look for a better % in 09

!!!!

private message me and let me know when. pick out a horse who will be a big price for the first time you do it but scratch him till he finds just the right weak field with a bad favorite or two and we will make big :$: :$:

:D
:tro:

Cannon Shell 12-05-2008 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Watson
!!!!

private message me and let me know when. pick out a horse who will be a big price for the first time you do it but scratch him till he finds just the right weak field with a bad favorite or two and we will make big :$: :$:

:D
:tro:

We are going to use the good stuff so weak fields wont be a factor.

Dr. Watson 12-05-2008 10:12 PM

but how good? good enough stuff to make Big Booster win the breeders cup sprint?

CSC 12-06-2008 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
I am going to start cheating next year...look for a better % in 09

Let me know when you do. ;) :$:

BTW Who is that horse that I am thinking of that you trained on turf which Jon Court rode that won that stake at Churchill Downs? I can't remember (her?) name, red silks I believe...

CSC 12-06-2008 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny
He has lost several owners and some are using him less eclusively but without knowing the owners' reasons it's hard to pin it on one caus. Maybe those trainers who supported him when he started didn't like the vast increase in the size of his operation. Some may have preferred different assistant trainers and others may have chosen not to stay on as Todd's day rate increased. There are alot of reasons to move from one trainer to another.
I do think that Seth was a great assistant. He is methodical and has a head like an encyclopedia. I cannot imagine that losing him didn't hurt Todd. I don't know Tristan so I can't make any comparision but losing Seth couldn't have been good.

For a guy who's clients can't get away fast enough, he sure has alot of horses.

Agreed he still has clients, it's the one's he has lost that are abit more confusing. I think there is a reason here beneign as it may be, but not being an insider I guess we will never know just why.

the_fat_man 12-06-2008 01:09 PM

Here's my take on this from a race watching perspective.

In the glory days, Pletcher horses would win, even though, in most cases, they were getting the worst trips, as WIDE Johnny V was up (and giving them his patented, wide, no cover, premature trips). You'd typically see JV beating on these horses on the turn and they'd still have enough to draw in the stretch.
Not happening any longer; these horses are not winning with JV up and, interestingly, in some cases, they'll win with another jock and a better trip.

I have no other evidence but something certainly stinks. Horses typically win when they get favorable trips. Horses winning when they don't get the best trip (or even when they get the worst trip) are a cause for a red flag. The dude was a juicer. No doubt about it. They took his drugs away and he's firing blanks (relative to past years). Having been around in the Oscar and Ferraiola , etc. eras, I'd like to think that I can spot juicers.

Cannon Shell 12-06-2008 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
Let me know when you do. ;) :$:

BTW Who is that horse that I am thinking of that you trained on turf which Jon Court rode that won that stake at Churchill Downs? I can't remember (her?) name, red silks I believe...

The only turf stake i won at CD was the Cardinal and Court was aleady in CA. He did ride Silent Emotion who may have won one of those overnight stakes.

GPK 12-06-2008 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Watson
i will guess 235. :D


Yeah...and I'm 6'7":)

Cannon Shell 12-06-2008 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Watson
but how good? good enough stuff to make Big Booster win the breeders cup sprint?

good enough to make the Green Monkey break his maiden

AeWingnut 12-06-2008 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The only turf stake i won at CD was the Cardinal and Court was aleady in CA. He did ride Silent Emotion who may have won one of those overnight stakes.


SILENT EMOTION @ Kentucky Downs ?
not a graded Stake

or an allowance @ Churchill with The Knight Sky?

Cannon Shell 12-06-2008 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AeWingnut
SILENT EMOTION @ Kentucky Downs ?
not a graded Stake

or an allowance @ Churchill with The Knight Sky?

I dont remember

King Glorious 12-06-2008 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept
Before this turns into the Ox Bow Incident, be aware that the violation is for Penicillin G Procaine, a Class 3 violation. This is a routine antibiotic used regularly with horses for a million reasons. It is not something that is going to enhance performance.

What is stunning about this is how stupid a thing it is for the Pletcher barn to have been using in close proximity to a major event. It is amazing that a guy who runs a business like Pletcher, would allow use of Penicillin G Procaine near one of his Breeders' Cup scheduled runners even 45 or 60 days out.

And scheduled withdrawl for it is 15 days...

This isn't 'cheating'.. It's sloppiness.

I agree with this. Would also add that even though the scheduled withdrawal time is 15 days, as you alluded to, it sometimes takes much longer and so administering it even 45 days out could be taking a risk.




Quote:

Originally Posted by Honu
I mean how hard is it to say hey boss we treated that filly with penicillian cream for her cracked heals or whatever the case may be and we arent sure if she will clear do you want to have her urine tested to make sure. Its very simple to avoid a bad test if people are on top of things and honest.

For the most part, I agree with this. But with this stuff, you can test on Friday and come up clear and test again on Saturday and find it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.