none of us took offense...we've all told some pretty raunchy jokes that were funny...i guess this particular one just didn't do it for us.

sorry mort-just don't think hubby would understand.

and that is very possible. but no doubt someone started questioning how she got some fancy threads, since i doubt she could afford it.

Well...OK. Do it to your tubby...I mean hubby..first.


Then do it to me. I would think he would understand it if you do it in that sequence.

I know a 300 lb Catholic Lady that had an absolute litter of kids n' the cherry on top had Downs Syndrome. I would imagine that was the last one(I'm sure she was 40-45 for the last one.) I'm talking about the risks involved when the woman is 40 on up, and already had atleast 3 or 4 kids.

That family photo just reeks of fertility.
They all ooze babies.
Drop em like fine hens.

Well, with what we now know about the risks, I think it's stupid for any woman to have her 5th child at age 43. She took a stupid gamble(and lost.) This is an excellent reason to question her decision making. It was a very poor decision she made. I think it was stupid. This was 2007/8. O.K., I don't know when your sibling was born, but in 2007/8 it was obviously a huge known risk for Sarah to have a 5th child at age 43. It's an excellent example of stupidity.

Steven H. Crist.

Looks like a donut maker put that cinnamon-crumb donut coating on Sarah's face.

Reaching? ....Any woman that has her 5th child at 43 is is gambling big time.

Has an irrevocable opinion about everything.

Reinforcing the az.zhole axiom.


Wok good.

but her gene pool wins regardless. and she already has a 17 yr old breeder.

1,000 years from now everyone will oppose both abortion and contraception. it's natural selection.

Fillies up 3-1...by the way.









:D

risk be damned.

i'm looking for applicants to bear me 43 children over the next 5 years.

pm if interested.

^^^^ Mouth suing brain for lack of support.

Yeah, I don't think it's kool to make Down Syndrome kids.You don't seem to mind. The more the merrier. This could for sure have been avoided. This is not random. To specifically answer your question, what she did is make a very poor decision. They say she is qualified and capable to possibly be President(and be responsible to make difficult important decisions.) I don't want somebody this stupid making any decisions about our country. Like it or not, having a 5th child at age 43 is incredibly stupid. She wants to be V.P. of the United States. Her decisions are being looked at, and this decision was a very stupid one. She fails to show the judgment necessary for this job. You want to overlook a decision this butt ignorant, then be my guest.

This message is hidden because Mortimer is on your ignore list.

Well no it's not.

^^^^ Mom was 46 when she gave birth to him.





:D

I couldn't resist.


And he wants to be a MLB manager.


:rolleyes:

This message is hidden because Mortimer is on your ignore list. He mainly comes here to talk about other posters on the site.

^^^^ Folding under direct posting pressure.

I would not be stunned to see Ventura hit the board, but I would be stunned if Ventura won. That horse is gutless. Easily the toss of the 2 day card for me.

-Hossy-

This message is hidden from Hossy....because he's on your ignore list.



:confused: ????:confused:

OOOOOOOOOO

Adios,amigo.

That means I'm leaving.

I's a "SkidsMom 8th Wonder of the World-ism."

Ditto.