![]() |
The scary part about this to me is that our democratic system needs to have a significant number of educated people in order to function. The gap grows, the democracy becomes more unstable. I really dont like that trend.
So we need to do our best to help educate every child in the US. It is in our national interest. It should make everyone in this country uneasy if the % of uneducated adults continues to grow. |
Quote:
B, we will have to agree to disagree on how we see the taxation thing, because, as I've said, people are all taxed equally; it's the money that is taxed differently. My pathetic below 40K income is taxed at exactly the same rate as Gates' first less-than-40K income. What is taxed more is the amount he makes above that. And if I made more, that amount of money would be taxed accordingly. So what are you saying, Bababooyee? You don't think Americans should provide public education for our young people? What's your obsession with determining whether it's a right or a privilege? What does that have to do with school performance? You think it's unfair for poor kids to get an education? Is that what you're saying? |
Editorial on rights from the Fort Wayne... Telegraph? Gazette? Journal? Mostly on second-hand smoke and laws, but some more general thoughts as well:
http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journal...l/16566691.htm Doesn't have anything to do with NCLB, however. |
And the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, from 1948.
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html |
Quote:
Bababooyee, the only thing that will keep society continuing to progress is people being willing to say that something, even if not enshrined yet in the Constitution, is a right. And if that something is morally correct, chances are, it will become one. I think people do have a right to an education, just as anti-slavery advocates once thought people had a right to be free. And suffragists once thought women had a right to a vote. Those didn't start as rights, but they became them. If we all shrugged, and said "Well, it's not in the Constitution as it stands now" and no one was willing to say, "But it should be" then I'd not be voting and Condi Rice, who many of you conservatives are touting on another board as Presidential caliber, would be calling Bush "Massah" instead of his wife calling her "Dr. Rice." And sometimes we screw up (see Amendments 18 and 21 of the Constitution) but we must always be willing to work for it. Education isn't a cure-all for society's ills, but it helps to level the playing field a bit. I'm all for it. (If you did get around to the Israel thing, let me know and my apologies for missing that the thread had been updated) |
And mondo apologies for being a complete moron at trying to put my responses in between quotes. I wish they'd taught me how to do that during my free education years...
|
Quote:
|
Well, well. well.
Good to see where this topic went. Now, did I mention that I saw Elvis walking his pet groundhog while staring in amazement at the UFO that landed outside the subway station? Two of the three "aliens" were union members, one had tenure, and the other one had parents that didn't care about education at all, whether it was a right or a not, as long as they could ride their spaceship without helmets, and of course, dine in a restaurant where they could pass on their second hand smoke. I heard that Elvis and the groundhog scored about the same on their standardized tests, so it looks like NCLB is safe. |
Further reading. Don't bother if you're "reading challenged" as it's a bit long.
http://www.alternet.org/story/47674/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mods??? |
To whoever wrote this (before deleting?!?) or believes it:
"As a renter, I pay no property (read, school) taxes, and frankly, I should. I benefit from an educated populace, too...." Huh? Sorry, just because you pay no property tax doesn't mean your own tax dollars do not go toward education. Hardly. In every state I've lived in, state funding EXCEEDS local funding of public schools. To further inform you, state school funding is provided through legislative act. I assure you that each of those laws includes language that "GUARANTEES each child an educational opportunity..." To me, that language confers a right, not a privilege. The purpose of state funding (which you pay for) is, in part, to "equalize" educational opportunies for students regardless of the local property tax revenues generated for each individual district. Local property taxes do not fully fund public schools. Not even close. |
Quote:
If we know exactly where the people (who don't encourage their kids to learn) are living,then pay the females in that area to not breed.If they stay there, and don't use the money to better their situation,then atleast they won't be bringing innocent kids into the equation.If they have kids(without a father,) then they won't get paid what other women in the area are getting. If there is a Father living with the child,then she continues to get paid(as long as the birth father is living with the child.)What will we have? 1)Women without kids(getting paid to stay that way.) 2)Women with kids and husbands(getting paid to stay together as a unit.) 3)Less n' less inner-city single parents that don't raise their kids well. |
ummm....maybe I missed something.
Yes, one of the "posters" continues to happily reside on my ignore. I don't respond unless someone quotes his words, no matter how divergent from the topic presented. No loss there. So, is someone attempting to state that our society is better off without and educated populace? If so, I'll just shake my head and walk away. For those that resent supporting the education of our children... "If you think education is expensive, consider the cost of ignorance." Pray for peace and understanding. Help the children. Smile more at others, even if they don't understand why you're doing so. One act of kindness begins many more. And learning is a life long process. Keep faith in others as much as you do yourself. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.