Quote: 
	
	
		
			 
			
				
					Originally Posted by cmorioles
					(Post 878186)
				 
				I will have I have some free time.  I can't imagine any seasoned horseplayer would even try to deny this is true. 
 
Steve often mentions the book "Champions", or did in the past.  Peruse that for a bit and just look at our top horses' Beyer figures before and after Lasix.  I particularly find it interesting to see the jumps on horses coming off of good races, including wins. 
			
			 
		 | 
	 
	 
 You say lasix is a performance enhancer that should be banned because you allege it improves horses performances by lengths, whether the horse is a bleeder or not.
 
I'm a veterinarian that agrees with the 99.99% of veterinary medical and scientific professionals that lasix is a necessary and good therapeutic medication whose use must be continued for the health and welfare of the race horse, and should not be considered a "performance enhancer".
 
I am listed on published scientific papers on the effect of lasix in race horses, and I have read the majority, if not all, of scientific information on the effect of lasix in race horses.
 
I've never read any studies that support your contention, that lasix is a strict performance enhancer.  Only studies that contradict it.  
 
So I'm really interested in your "facts", as your contention, unsupported by the veterinary medical community, is 100% of the argument against using this valuable therapeutic medication to help horses.
 
**  The common way for "seasoned horse players" to bet horses is first or second use lasix.  There's some interesting scientific data related to that.  To bad horse players ignore science ;)  
 
But that doesn't have anything to do with the odd allegation that "lasix is a performance enhancer in all horses that moves horses up lengths". 
 
I'll be interested to see your "proof".  Can't wait.  
	 |