Isn't this a case of the better a pedigree the higher the stud fee, in the end the different Gr.1's may look fancier on a resume, but the pedigree is the major difference, ie.. an Unbridled winning the Pacific Classic is going to be more attractive to breeders than a Tiznow winning the JCGC. Skimming was just not attractive to breeders on any coast, he simply loved Del Mar.

Two of my favorite horses are West Coast runners, Lava Man and The Tin Man. I do not think either will win a BC race, however. The Europeans will dominate the three turf races and East Coast horses will win the Distaff, the Sprint, and the Classic, in my opinion. The Juvenile and the Juvenile Filly are a coin toss.

I agree with what you say. A blue blooded grade 1 winner is a blue blooded grade 1 winner. The only race that really makes a HUGE difference is the KYD anyway.

However, if the pedigree on each respective horse were identical, I would agree that the horse winning the east coast races would get more attention and a higher fee.

This is very true. Many West Coasters feel the industry looks down their noses at their stakes races and feel there is a major bias. Trust me I am a frequent poster on the Del Mar site and there is a huge East Coast inferiority complex out there.
There may be a bias but it is based on the fact that the East Coast Stakes races are much, much older, many well over a hundred years and are the foundation of the sport today.
Also it has a lot to do with the fact that on the East Coast you will see many different horses from different circuits ship to each other races. For example you will see the Ky based horses and the NY based horse and mid Atlantic based horse all ship to each others major races. Therefore racing against stronger and different competition. In So Cal you pretty much have the same horses, outside an occasional shipper from the East, competing with each other.
It's just my opinion of why East Coast Stakes races are weighed more heavily.

I agree with you on all points. I would just like to add in Mineshaft and his connections here. They took considerable heat for not running their horse in a West Coast Breeders' Cup; it was not the shipping, but the destination that was the problem. The connections just do not run in California. The connections are East Coast in their thinking; they are old guard who thought winning Grade I's at Belmont spelled champion. Until rather recently champions were crowned there. Slew O' Gold is an example of that; he almost owned fall championship races at Belmont and he had the Eclipses to prove it. I would be very surprised to see Bernardini run on the West Coast, if he runs next year. The Breeders' Cup is in the East next year anyway.

Not to start or get into an arguement since everyone knows I love the horse, but RH10's stud deal may also have had something to do with his daddy being the "LATE" Kris S, who was a good daddy. I am not arguing anything about RH10. Just stating that his stud deal may not only have had to deal with his race record.

So don't diss my boy. :p

That is soo true. Fair or not races won at the two big NY Tracks weigh in the most. If you want an example of how important a win at Saratoga is just look at the standings in each of the divisions. Just look at Discreet Cat. He may be a monster but he is still to race in any major stakes here stateside and his win in an allowance race at Saratoga put him in the top ten 3 yr olds.