Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   obama ratings hit new low (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43483)

kp319 08-16-2011 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob (Post 800541)
If he's running against Perry or Bachman, he sure will. Still think Romney is his only realy threat.

Romney.... Mormon and what has he accomplished in Mass? Bachman.. no way and Perry won't fly in the states that count.

dellinger63 08-16-2011 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kp319 (Post 800586)
Romney.... Mormon and what has he accomplished in Mass? .

So America will elect an African American but not a Mormon? :zz:

You do realize he's experienced success in the private sector as have a bunch of other Mormons.

Something the current President is missing and it shows!

my miss storm cat 08-16-2011 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800401)
Maybe Axelrod will have them dig up bin Laden and shoot him again.

I usually lurk here and go bang my head against the wall or scream or soemthing and keep my mouth shut.

Great line! :tro:

I really do wanna stay out of this but gotta say it once...

No way can Obama win again no matter what.

I think it'll end up being a Perry / Bachmann ticket and that they'll slaughter him.

Okay gonna tiptoe away now and let the big people continue fighting...:D

joeydb 08-16-2011 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by my miss storm cat (Post 800595)
I usually lurk here and go bang my head against the wall or scream or soemthing and keep my mouth shut.

Great line! :tro:

I really do wanna stay out of this but gotta say it once...

No way can Obama win again no matter what.

I think it'll end up being a Perry / Bachmann ticket and that they'll slaughter him.

Okay gonna tiptoe away now and let the big people continue fighting...:D


Come on in - the water is fine! :D

Hey, I try to have fun here too, even though more often than not it gets heated, but this is a horse racing board and the politics are mostly for diversion and to sharpen debate skills.

I don't think it would be Perry. Too scary even for me as a lifetime Republican to have another Texas governor with similar inflection on his voice.

I think Romney/Bachmann or Bachmann/Paul at this point, but anything can happen, and it most certainly will be interesting.

ateamstupid 08-16-2011 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 800591)
So America will elect an African American but not a Mormon? :zz:

You do realize he's experienced success in the private sector as have a bunch of other Mormons.

Something the current President is missing and it shows!

He also fired thousands of people and closed factories everywhere he went, so yeah, have fun voting for President Gekko. I'm sure he gives two sh its about creating jobs.

my miss storm cat 08-16-2011 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800604)
Come on in - the water is fine! :D

Hey, I try to have fun here too, even though more often than not it gets heated, but this is a horse racing board and the politics are mostly for diversion and to sharpen debate skills.

I don't think it would be Perry. Too scary even for me as a lifetime Republican to have another Texas governor with similar inflection on his voice.

I think Romney/Bachmann or Bachmann/Paul at this point, but anything can happen, and it most certainly will be interesting.

I think Paul turned off a lot of people during the debate (Iran) but alas... I need to go see which horsies went swimming in Hong Kong and important stuff like that but I shall be lurking around down here, albeit quietly. :D

Carry on. :p

joeydb 08-16-2011 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 800605)
He also fired thousands of people and closed factories everywhere he went, so yeah, have fun voting for President Gekko. I'm sure he gives two sh its about creating jobs.

Yeah, you're right. He should have kept the factories open at a loss, retained all the jobs and just went out of business.

ateamstupid 08-16-2011 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800607)
Yeah, you're right. He should have kept the factories open at a loss, retained all the jobs and just went out of business.

I know this is hard for the corporate stooge party to understand, but the responsibilities of CEO and President of the United States aren't the same. Often (like now) they're diametrically opposed.

jms62 08-16-2011 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800607)
Yeah, you're right. He should have kept the factories open at a loss, retained all the jobs and just went out of business.

Yes the downsizing and outsource metality is kicking ass as a business strategy. Fire all your customers customers and scratch your ass wondering why no one is left to buy anything and your house is worth 1/2 of what it was 4 years ago. Then wonder why your stock portfolio is getting pounded. The solution cut more jobs. Can you say Death Sprial thats where we are and it seems fine by you 1980's republicans. Let me ask a question. Are you retired or Semi retired?

joeydb 08-16-2011 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 800608)
I know this is hard for the corporate stooge party to understand, but the responsibilities of CEO and President of the United States aren't the same. Often (like now) they're diametrically opposed.

OK, just so I'm reading you right, you don't dispute that as a CEO he likely acted properly and within his powers to protect the company...from eventual bankruptcy?

I would suspect that, having different responsibilites and powers, he would be different as president as well. The difference is, Romney actually understands how the economy works. This is better than knowing how you wish the economy worked.

joeydb 08-16-2011 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 800609)
Yes the downsizing and outsource metality is kicking ass as a business strategy. Fire all your customers customers and scratch your ass wondering why no one is left to buy anything and your house is worth 1/2 of what it was 4 years ago. Then wonder why your stock portfolio is getting pounded. The solution cut more jobs. Can you say Death Sprial thats where we are and it seems fine by you 1980's republicans. Let me ask a question. Are you retired or Semi retired?

What do you do when the profit is not enough to support the business? You cut expenses. Every accountant will tell you that.

I still work and I count my pennies too like the CEO's count those of the company. There isn't any unearned government check coming in for me. I have to get my budget right.

jms62 08-16-2011 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800611)
OK, just so I'm reading you right, you don't dispute that as a CEO he likely acted properly and within his powers to protect the company...from eventual bankruptcy?

I would suspect that, having different responsibilites and powers, he would be different as president as well. The difference is, Romney actually understands how the economy works. This is better than knowing how you wish the economy worked.

And you know for certain that each company was facing bankruptcy? More likely scenario he wanted his 100 million in options to appreciate to 150 million and really could care less about the people he destroyed. Your thinking is flawed and right out of the early 80's. Profitable companies have been cutting employees for YEARS now so the upper crust could profit more not even giving 2 shits about the future when no one has any money to buy anything becuase they GOT THIERS. This unmitigated greed affects EVERYONE and EVERYONES children/grandchildren. AN economy can not sustain itself when 5% of the people have 90% of the wealth.

joeydb 08-16-2011 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by my miss storm cat (Post 800606)
I think Paul turned off a lot of people during the debate (Iran) but alas... I need to go see which horsies went swimming in Hong Kong and important stuff like that but I shall be lurking around down here, albeit quietly. :D

Carry on. :p

I can see your point, and I agree re: Iran. I just thought that his platform and core beliefs from the last 30 years fit very well against our current crisis.

He would have fared better had he not said the Iran lines.

Happy stalking... :)

ateamstupid 08-16-2011 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800611)
OK, just so I'm reading you right, you don't dispute that as a CEO he likely acted properly and within his powers to protect the company...from eventual bankruptcy?

I would suspect that, having different responsibilites and powers, he would be different as president as well. The difference is, Romney actually understands how the economy works. This is better than knowing how you wish the economy worked.

Oh jeez, yeah, Romney knows how to fix the most complex economy in the world because he became successful by being a ruthless CEO of a venture capitalist firm and Obama doesn't even know how to make change of a dollar because he was a community organizer. We get it.

They're both dipshits with no idea or desire to create jobs. Enough with the talking points.

joeydb 08-16-2011 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 800615)
Oh jeez, yeah, Romney knows how to fix the most complex economy in the world because he became successful by being a ruthless CEO of a venture capitalist firm and Obama doesn't even know how to make change of a dollar because he was a community organizer. We get it.

They're both dipshits with no idea or desire to create jobs. Enough with the talking points.

Believe it or not, I'm not trying to be overly ideological here. Open question: what would be the best profession to have in order to prepare oneself for the presidency?

Evidently, a community organizer/Harvard law professor is not the answer. And you point out the potential unsuitability of a CEO of a venture capital firm. And Congress is full of mostly lawyers of all stripes.

jms62 08-16-2011 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 800615)
Oh jeez, yeah, Romney knows how to fix the most complex economy in the world because he became successful by being a ruthless CEO of a venture capitalist firm and Obama doesn't even know how to make change of a dollar because he was a community organizer. We get it.

They're both dipshits with no idea or desire to create jobs. Enough with the talking points.

They all have Ideas Team. Make it expensive for companies to outsource. Do away with H1B program. Charge tarrifs on Imports vs Trade Balance. They certainly know what to do but it is suicide for them to do it. Thier money supply would be cut off.

joeydb 08-16-2011 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 800613)
And you know for certain that each company was facing bankruptcy? More likely scenario he wanted his 100 million in options to appreciate to 150 million and really could care less about the people he destroyed. Your thinking is flawed and right out of the early 80's. Profitable companies have been cutting employees for YEARS now so the upper crust could profit more not even giving 2 shits about the future when no one has any money to buy anything becuase they GOT THIERS. This unmitigated greed affects EVERYONE and EVERYONES children/grandchildren. AN economy can not sustain itself when 5% of the people have 90% of the wealth.

I don't know that for a fact. It just seems logical that a company would seek to survive and thrive as well as possible for as long as possible. On the flipside, they have to make sure that their products, goods, and/or services remain competitively priced, or the company will decline. Unless you have either a monopoly or a company whose products are vastly superior (i.e. Rolls Royce) you have to run a company efficiently with solid profits. In a competitive environment, it's rare for a company to make astronomical profits.

So I don't think my reasoning was flawed - but I did make the above assumptions.

Paraphrasing you, a country cannot sustain itself when the top earning 5% are paying 58.7%, or when 47% of the people pay no income tax.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2...ble-dip-scare/

dellinger63 08-16-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 800605)
He also fired thousands of people and closed factories everywhere he went, so yeah, have fun voting for President Gekko. I'm sure he gives two sh its about creating jobs.

To be honest I'm having a huge problem warming up to any GOP candidate. But certainly the fact Romney is mormon isn't a reason. It's hard for me to embrace his State's healthcare plan and the fact Mass is at or near the top of the list as far as debt goes. But I'd still vote for him over Obama.

Bachman is an idiot IMO and no way she gets my vote. I'll leave the vote for Pres. unpunched if she gets the nom.

Antitrust32 08-16-2011 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800618)
I don't know that for a fact. It just seems logical that a company would seek to survive and thrive as well as possible for as long as possible. On the flipside, they have to make sure that their products, goods, and/or services remain competitively priced, or the company will decline. Unless you have either a monopoly or a company whose products are vastly superior (i.e. Rolls Royce) you have to run a company efficiently with solid profits. In a competitive environment, it's rare for a company to make astronomical profits.

So I don't think my reasoning was flawed - but I did make the above assumptions.

Paraphrasing you, a country cannot sustain itself when the top earning 5% are paying 58.7%, or when 47% of the people pay no income tax.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2...ble-dip-scare/



There should be a flat tax with a cut off poverty line. If the top 5% control 70% of the wealth like they do now, they should be paying 70% of the taxes that the US collects.

Warren Buffet paid less of a percentage of income taxes than I did last year. That's ridiculous.

ateamstupid 08-16-2011 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 800618)
Paraphrasing you, a country cannot sustain itself when the top earning 5% are paying 58.7%, or when 47% of the people pay no income tax.

"Buffett noted that his federal tax bill, including payroll taxes, came out to just 17.4 percent of his taxable income last year, a lower percentage than anyone else in his office."

Has Buffett just gamed the system? I'd like to know, because I see Republicans shouting all the time about how the rich are already paying a million percent, but it just makes no sense considering our tax revenues.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.