Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   casey anthony (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42935)

alysheba4 07-05-2011 04:02 PM

an all time low:(

Antitrust32 07-05-2011 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alysheba4 (Post 788938)
an all time low:(

sad day for all.. unless you are Casey or Somer of course.

somerfrost 07-05-2011 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 788928)
At least you aren't judging.

Let's be honest, you've probably pulled your pud a few times to Casey, while imagining she's a vampire or something so you're going to go off on your lecture crusade now.

Phuck off creep.

Typical response from you...you disagree with me so you attack, you disagree with the verdict so more hatred....sorry to disappoint you but your opinion simply doesn't matter. I'm not going back and forth with you, perhaps you see yourself as the arbiter of all that's right in the world...enjoy.

keithting 07-05-2011 05:01 PM

A sad day for the U.S. justice system

But the good news is that that juror will make her cruise afterall (departing on the 7th).....

Dahoss 07-05-2011 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 788945)
Typical response from you...you disagree with me so you attack, you disagree with the verdict so more hatred....sorry to disappoint you but your opinion simply doesn't matter. I'm not going back and forth with you, perhaps you see yourself as the arbiter of all that's right in the world...enjoy.

You're such a douche. You say you know nothing about the case, then applaud the result. Don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out why.

The funny thing is everything you project on me, is what makes you the douche that you are. Your opinion doesn't matter. You see yourself as the arbiter of what is right and wrong. You can't wait to hop on here and tell people how they should think, how they should react. No one cares about your lectures or your world views.

Like I said to you before....go back into your cave you creep.

Princess Doreen 07-05-2011 05:34 PM

I don't think this jury undestood the meaning of "reasonable doibt."

It would be hard to convict someone on a couple of examples of circumstantial evidence. But, in this case, they could throw out a 100 of the examples and still not be left with reasonable doubt.

I would submit that this jury was too tired and worn out serving on that sequestered jury for 6 weeks to spend the time to fully examine the evidence. They just wanted to put an end to it and took the quick and easy way out.

The distaff version of OJ. What a tragedy.

Danzig 07-05-2011 06:43 PM

i agree princess. unless you have 100 witnesses who all say the same thing, there will always be some 'reasonable' doubt.

its too bad that it ended like that. i am amazed. honest people with nothing whatsoever to hide don't make up a string of lies a mile long.
people have been convicted of murder without a body! this girl gets away with it, and they had the body. unbelievable.

keithting 07-05-2011 07:02 PM

I would so love for someone to name a thoroughbred "Casey Did It"".......

geeker2 07-05-2011 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keithting (Post 788968)
I would so love for someone to name a thoroughbred "Casey Did It"".......

or Bella Vita

declansharbor 07-05-2011 08:22 PM

I wish PackerBacker would invite BuffyFrost over to his trailer and a daisycutter just so happens to precisely fall into their arms as they hug each other.

Antitrust32 07-06-2011 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Princess Doreen (Post 788952)
I don't think this jury undestood the meaning of "reasonable doibt."

It would be hard to convict someone on a couple of examples of circumstantial evidence. But, in this case, they could throw out a 100 of the examples and still not be left with reasonable doubt.

I would submit that this jury was too tired and worn out serving on that sequestered jury for 6 weeks to spend the time to fully examine the evidence. They just wanted to put an end to it and took the quick and easy way out.

The distaff version of OJ. What a tragedy.

exactly.. i was listening to an interview of Juror 14 (2nd alternate). Asked about Casey partying for a month (it doesnt look good, but doesnt prove anything). they basically said not guilty because of three things: 1) no exact cause of death (because casey through the body in the woods and there were only bones left) 2) no time of death (also because of casey's doing) and 3) they didnt believe George, therefor giving credibility to Casey's ridiculous defense of drowning and molestation, neither of which were supported by a SHRED of real or circumstencial (sp?) evidence.

Basically, the jury rejected the circumstencial evidence, even though it overwhelmed them to a point where I couldnt see them letting her off. the jury was filled with by the book morons.

GenuineRisk 07-06-2011 09:05 AM

I confess, I didn't know anything about the trial until about two weeks ago, and then didn't follow it because the subject matter upset me too much, but the verdict doesn't mean she didn't do it; it means the prosecution didn't make their case. Cases built on circumstantial evidence, which this was, from what I gather, are very, very hard to prove, and it sounds like the prosecution, in their rush to bring this to trial, did a sh*tty job of it.

The onus of guilt must always be on the state to prove, not on the defendant to disprove. We give that up, in our rush to have a perpetrator to blame, then we might as well give up any notion that we believe in a free society.

And we can never underestimate the power of the media to shape the narrative we see, and clearly the media wanted the narrative to be that this woman did it. Again, I'm not saying she didn't; I didn't follow the case. But, and be honest with yourself, how many of us were absolutely sure that Gary Condit was involved in Chandra Levy's disappearance? Because that was the narrative the media wanted, and that's what they put forth, to the exclusion of any other possibilities.

Danzig 07-06-2011 09:25 AM

see, i don't see it as being like gary condit. he was a slimeball, but there was nothing tying him to her crime. no smelly car, no string of lies, etc.

now, the atlanta bombing and richard jewell...that was definitely a media frenzy, as was the duke rape case.

Antitrust32 07-06-2011 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 789031)
see, i don't see it as being like gary condit. he was a slimeball, but there was nothing tying him to her crime. no smelly car, no string of lies, etc.

now, the atlanta bombing and richard jewell...that was definitely a media frenzy, as was the duke rape case.

exactly, condit was purely speculation. this case was nothing like that.

it was a lot like the Peterson california murder case though.

Princess Doreen 07-06-2011 12:06 PM

A California jury convicting Scott Peterson was making up for what the OJ jury did. The Casey Anthony jury had far more CE than the Scott Peterson jury had.

Casey is saying that the first thing she wants to do when she gets out of prison is have another baby. I guess she wants to sucker her parents into supporting and taking care of another kid.

This gal is a sociopath - she'll not be able to overcome it, and she'll be even more vulnerable to trouble now because the predators will swoop down on her like a plague. Kharma will catch up with her... I'm hoping.

Bigsmc 07-06-2011 12:10 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 1778

clyde 07-06-2011 12:15 PM

I'm sorry to say this ( no I'm not!) , but everyone who has been vexing over this is a control freak.


A Black Wolf is going to eat you.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.