Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Illinois becomes 16th state to ban death penalty (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41522)

SOREHOOF 03-24-2011 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 762914)
Yeah, there is no way of knowing which punishment is worse, I suspect that again it depends on the individual...some folks can probably adapt to being confined to a cell while others will quickly find themselves praying for death. I saw evidence of this in my years working in prisons. I wonder though, what does it say that folks who are against the death penalty feel obligated to argue that they are supporting a worse fate?

Here is a good example of someone who clearly is having the time of his life behind bars. Life w/o parole was a gift for this animal. I'm against the death penalty,(out of distrust of the legal system), but I'd personally pull the lever for a lot of them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slm_YDzx4vI

Danzig 03-24-2011 08:32 PM

16 down, 34 to go...

somerfrost 03-24-2011 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 763014)
16 down, 34 to go...

more will follow for economic reasons, sadly few for moral ones.

Antitrust32 03-25-2011 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 763034)
more will follow for economic reasons, sadly few for moral ones.

are you implying that people who support the death penalty do not have morals?

miraja2 03-25-2011 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 762751)
honestly, cold blooded killers and people who rape kids dont deserve the use of oxygen.

The major problem is that - even today - people are sometimes wrongfully convicted of these crimes. There have been a lot of strange cases where new evidence emerges ten or more years down the road that exonerates a person who has been convicted. If you sentence a person to life in prison, and then some case takes an odd twist at some future date, the person might still have a chance to enjoy some part of their remaining life. Once they're executed, however, its obviously too late.

somerfrost 03-25-2011 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 763058)
are you implying that people who support the death penalty do not have morals?

no...I completely understand why many folks are supportive of the death penalty and would never say they are lacking in morals. Morality in a gray world takes different paths...all I'm saying is that I wish if it is abolished it would be because folks do so because they feel it's the right thing to do, not to save a buck!

Coach Pants 03-25-2011 10:09 AM

The only true way to end violence is by conditioning the masses. You can't tell the population to not kill when you do the same.

Lead by example yadda yadda cliche dur.

Antitrust32 03-25-2011 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miraja2 (Post 763076)
The major problem is that - even today - people are sometimes wrongfully convicted of these crimes. There have been a lot of strange cases where new evidence emerges ten or more years down the road that exonerates a person who has been convicted. If you sentence a person to life in prison, and then some case takes an odd twist at some future date, the person might still have a chance to enjoy some part of their remaining life. Once they're executed, however, its obviously too late.

thats why I put a lot of weight on DNA evidence. I have no problem executing these monsters when the DNA evidence is there.

IMO, DNA makes a big difference in wrongful convictions, I could see where the were more prevelent back 20 years, even 10 years ago. I'm sure there are still wrongful convictions... but if the DNA is there, go for the execution.

somerfrost 03-25-2011 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 763107)
thats why I put a lot of weight on DNA evidence. I have no problem executing these monsters when the DNA evidence is there.

IMO, DNA makes a big difference in wrongful convictions, I could see where the were more prevelent back 20 years, even 10 years ago. I'm sure there are still wrongful convictions... but if the DNA is there, go for the execution.

I understand the power of DNA evidence but I question how often it is the determining factor in capital offenses, many times there is no DNA evidence or it is inconclusive. I watch the virtual explosion in science in the last 20 years or so and have to wonder....10-20 years from now, what new techniques will have been developed? Yesterday's science fiction is today's science. Will, for example, we be able to examine the optic nerves of murder victims and be able to produce images of their last minutes? If so, how many murderers will that convict and how many innocent folks could that technology clear?

dellinger63 03-25-2011 11:00 AM

I would imagine someone, somewhere has already 'planted' DNA evidence as a safeguard. But when you review the case details of those who Quinn let off death row there really is no question of guilt DNA or not.

And the thought of life in prison being worse than the death penalty is ludicrous. I'll wager not a single one of the 16 let off will commit suicide and far more appeal the death sentence rather than waive rights and quicken the process.

timmgirvan 03-25-2011 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 763014)
16 down, 41 to go...


FTFY

joeydb 03-28-2011 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 763107)
thats why I put a lot of weight on DNA evidence. I have no problem executing these monsters when the DNA evidence is there.

IMO, DNA makes a big difference in wrongful convictions, I could see where the were more prevelent back 20 years, even 10 years ago. I'm sure there are still wrongful convictions... but if the DNA is there, go for the execution.

Interesting. DNA evidence is also why I'm opposed to abortion. See the other thread if you are curious.

And I'm all for using the DNA evidence in capital cases to make absolutely certain that no innocent people are executed.

dellinger63 03-28-2011 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 762863)
But Roger Schnorr, whose sister, Donna, 27, of Geneva, was abducted, raped and murdered by Dugan in 1984, called Quinn's decision "quite aggravating." Schnorr said he met with Quinn for two hours a few weeks ago — along with prosecutors and other victims' relatives — and said the governor seemed "quite uninformed."
!

Quinn and Ryan appear to be equally inept but what else would one expect out of IL politics. What other Gov. can claim fame to indirectly causing a family to burn alive and then let off the State's worse murderers before going to jail himself. And that fossil of a wife he has, who was supposed to die months ago is still alive and now home? Let Ryan do every last hour of his sentence and add on the time he was allowed to visit his dying wife! Maybe a transfer to the IL State system and allowing him to be a cellie of each of the murderers he let off death row would be good for all involved.

http://www.suntimes.com/4512063-417/...erstand-pardon

dellinger63 03-28-2011 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeydb (Post 763811)
And I'm all for using the DNA evidence in capital cases to make absolutely certain that no innocent people are executed.

Not if your barber whacked someone and left a few of your hairs (the ones he pulled off combing your hair) at the scene.

hoovesupsideyourhead 03-28-2011 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 763830)
Not if your barber whacked someone and left a few of your hairs (the ones he pulled off combing your hair) at the scene.

tony..the barber..sets up the fatman..:eek:

dellinger63 03-28-2011 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead (Post 763870)
tony..the barber..sets up the fatman..:eek:

what's done is done lol... Hopefully Tony is still around tho he'd be in his 90's now.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.