Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Believable ROI and Win % (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30087)

gales0678 06-05-2009 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315
Just realized that I read Gales win % fig as ROI for some reason. His ROI guess is even more impossible than what I thought it was. And Antitrust, I agree that it's very hard to profit over time, but not nearly as impossible as you think.


what if the guy hit say MTB in the derby , wouldn't that push his ROI % or if he scored with a 1ster at toga that paid $80 , then went cold for a while and then went on a chalk fest run to boost his win % but not pumping up the roi as much???

Antitrust32 06-05-2009 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gales0678
some of the .1% in the country with positive roi's are right here Lori !



LOL gales. I've got a nice bridge to sell you also!

the_fat_man 06-05-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
I dont really believe anyone who say they make money gambling on horses.

This was probably more the case 20 or 30 years ago than it is today. With access to all the tracks presently operating, one need no longer be limited and could play to their strength(s). It's not about taking what your local track gives you and make the best of it any longer.

gales0678 06-05-2009 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
LOL gales. I've got a nice bridge to sell you also!


kaspet
blackthoratwind
dahoss
rootdog
bigmc
rudeboyelvis
hovvesupsideyourhead
gpk - maybe not this year
scav - ok he's in the 99.9% but at least he has fun:D :D

Coach Pants 06-05-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gales0678
kaspet
blackthoratwind
dahoss
rootdog
bigmc
rudeboyelvis
hovvesupsideyourhead
gpk - maybe not this year
scav - ok he's in the 99.9% but at least he has fun:D :D

I'm familiar with a few of those. No idea who the other 4 are.

gales0678 06-05-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
I'm familiar with a few of those. No idea who the other 4 are.


coach i take runnerup to Kasept in spelling , but , i am good with numbers ,you know 2+2=5:eek: :eek:

Antitrust32 06-05-2009 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man
This was probably more the case 20 or 30 years ago than it is today. With access to all the tracks presently operating, one need no longer be limited and could play to their strength(s). It's not about taking what your local track gives you and make the best of it any longer.

That does makes sense... go through the different tracks and make one or two bets that you feel very comfortable with. Would take a ton of skill and discipline. But I'm willing to lower my percentage to 99% of horseplayers lose $ instead of 99.9%.

Question for you, would it even be possible to have a positive ROI by making win bets only?

Or is multi-race bets the only way?

MISTERGEE 06-05-2009 02:37 PM

most people ive ever known to win over a length of time

1-bet exotics

2- bet extremely heavy, using many combos

3- work on a very small roi, and also depend on their rebates

Antitrust32 06-05-2009 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gales0678
kaspet
blackthoratwind
dahoss
rootdog
bigmc
rudeboyelvis
hovvesupsideyourhead
gpk - maybe not this year
scav - ok he's in the 99.9% but at least he has fun:D :D


Its not my business whether those people have positive ROI's or not... but the only way I'd believe someone who told me they made money betting would be to see their tax forms.


Edit: mistergee makes a very good point. Rebates can give you a chance at a positive ROI.

the_fat_man 06-05-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Question for you, would it even be possible to have a positive ROI by making win bets only?

Or is multi-race bets the only way?

This is a multi-race forum. Here, it's all about playing exotics.

Personally, I think investing a (relatively) significant amount of money to get back 6-10:1 (or less, as is usually the case) is not the way to go. I believe that it's easier to make money betting to win. And, additionally, it's a bit harder to win betting limited number (2 plays max) exotics (exactas and doubles).

But the real problem, assuming one has the skill, is actually believing you can do it. Let's say, for example, that I have a 25% hit rate with a 25% ROI over 60 win bets. At what point do I start believing that I can do this consistently? Over how many races do I need to show similar numbers? 100, 500, 1000? And, additionally, how am I showing this return: are my prices consistent or do I have a number of huge longshots? Do I count on 5 'scores' over the year to make my money, like the exotic player, or do I have consistent returns? It's a mind game thing.:rolleyes:

The Indomitable DrugS 06-05-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gales0678
some of the .1% in the country with positive roi's are right here Lori !

The number is obviously much higher than .1%

Jockey Kerwin Clark has ridden over 3,000 mounts in his career at Evangeline Downs ... and his ROI is above $2.40.

So, he's over 20% profitable from a 3K + sample size .. and he doesn't have nearly as much freedom as a bettor does to pick and choose.

2 Dollar Bill 06-05-2009 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man
No

There's someone claiming a high ROI and Win % for over 900 races (over the course of 1 year).

Chucklestheclown ??

The Indomitable DrugS 06-05-2009 04:10 PM

Some guy from California who has done seminars with none other than Aaron Hesz.

He claims a prominent California breeder asked him to take over his ranch and breed his horses but he declined.

The Indomitable DrugS 06-05-2009 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man
With all these races being taken off the turf (BEL and just about everywhere else on the eastern part) I've been reading (on that other forum) about some extraordinary claims concerning ROI and Win %.

What would be a believable win % for win bets?

What would be a believable win % for exotics bets?

What would be a believable ROI for win bets?

What would be a believable ROI for exotic bets?

What would be a believable ROI for all bets?

Looking more for empirically grounded responses.

Just using my current stats as a reference..

My top selection in the paper this year is winning at 28.5% with a $2.13 ROI

My top two selections in an exacta box have connected 22-for-144 - so 15.3% with a $3.61 ROI

My top three selections in a Tri box have connected 11-for-123 - so 9% with a $1.98 ROI .. on 21 occasions one of my top 3 was scratched.

Bobby Fischer 06-05-2009 04:50 PM

if you are hitting 35% of win bets with a high ROI you are good enough to be questioned (or are really lying) , and at the same time you are saying that you don't understand the parimutuel system.

the goal in a parimutuel market is to pick low priced losers. Then you search all the available pools and find the highest percentage play that returns your minimum value demand. If your bankroll is $1000, you might bet about $20-40 on the play.
Usually your are limited to WPS and DB Ex. If you are willing to gamble risk of ruin for higher payout you can use the multi race wagers.

MISTERGEE 06-05-2009 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Just using my current stats as a reference..

My top selection in the paper this year is winning at 28.5% with a $2.13 ROI

My top two selections in an exacta box have connected 22-for-144 - so 15.3% with a $3.61 ROI

My top three selections in a Tri box have connected 11-for-123 - so 9% with a $1.98 ROI .. on 21 occasions one of my top 3 was scratched.

Did you keep track of how often 1 of your top 3 choices won, if you can hit at about 75% amongst top 3 and fit them into a dutching odds grid you can bang out a nice profit

MISTERGEE 06-05-2009 07:55 PM

i should add you are obviously doing very well with your top pick only already


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.