SCUDSBROTHER |
05-03-2009 01:09 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
1000% should have been an inquiry. Both jocks should have claimed foul.
|
Now...Wait, Wait, Wait! Vic we have had this discussion before. This is not a new thing he does. I brought this up with you in here on July 11th, 2008 race 4. This is no worse than that, and you were perfectly fine with leaving that up. This is no worse than what he did on that night. I think what he did that night was more deserving than this. It's the same method though. He sees someone has more horse. He taps lefthanded. The horse shoots sideways, and he keeps it from going as far over as the other guy(and horse) thinks he's going to go. The other horse moves out, and loses a lil momentum, and that allows GOGO to hang on. It's the same deal. This is not something new. This is what he does. I haven't been able to find the head-on of the Derby, but I bet it isn't worse than that night(probably a little less.) This is no dummy. He knows exactly what he's doing. He's like a surgeon with this move. I doubt you're going to see massive contact. It's gunna be more a threatening thing he does(to force lateral movement by the enemy, and a slight momentum loss....it allows him to hold on.)
7/11/08 HWD RACE 4...Successful(NO INQUIRY)
8-13-08 DMR RACE 8...Successful (Jockey claim of foul not allowed)-even if you only have Calracing.com you can see head-on inquiry starting at 5:50...I don't know why they don't think that's enough )
1-10-09 SA RACE 3...(didn't work...horse got up despite his antics)
K DERBY-09......Successful(NO INQUIRY)
|