Derby Trail Forums
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Congress in Horse Racing (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22719)

Cannon Shell 05-26-2008 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DogsUp
Anything at the Federal level will trump anything at the State level. If Congress wants to have a single body running racing, then I think they will be in over their head and move on. Now, I am all for states right. I guess you can call me a John C Calhoun person (minus th belief in slavery). I do not know if a single body would be better or not. All I know is that the Federal Gov't can tell the states to do whatever they want.
Depends upon the interpretation of the commerce clause of the constitution. Does horseracing really fall under interstate commerece? You could argue that simulcasting does but the regulation of the sport in regards to the actual sport does not seem to be be interstate commerce.

parsixfarms 05-27-2008 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Depends upon the interpretation of the commerce clause of the constitution. Does horseracing really fall under interstate commerece? You could argue that simulcasting does but the regulation of the sport in regards to the actual sport does not seem to be be interstate commerce.
While the current Supreme Court has been trying to rein in, pardon the pun, Congress's ability to legislate in certain areas (the case where the Court invalidated, on Commerce Clause grounds, the Congressional act prohibiting guns within so many feet of a school comes to mind immediately), I don't think there is any question that racing, in its modern form, constitutes interstate commerce.

ShadowRoll 05-27-2008 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Depends upon the interpretation of the commerce clause of the constitution. Does horseracing really fall under interstate commerece? You could argue that simulcasting does but the regulation of the sport in regards to the actual sport does not seem to be be interstate commerce.
Does the term "shipper" ring a bell?

Danzig 05-27-2008 05:48 PM
the feds have their way of getting their way. highway money and drinking age for example.
but really, it would be a bit amusing on the states behalf to suddenly squawk states rights, since they willingly give up plenty so as not to hit their budget.

but i don't like congress being involved in congress, so i sure don't want them in horse racing.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.