Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Breeders' Cup Archive (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Tips/Thoughts on Breeders' Cup tickets this year? (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24969)

hrfan 10-20-2008 12:59 AM

[quote=DaHoss9698]No problem mom. There's an ignore function. You don't like what I have to say, I'd suggest using it.[/QUOTE

o boy

miraja2 10-20-2008 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
It doesn't really take a rocket scientist to figure out which 14 are going to get into these races so you have a pretty good idea of who is going to run at this point, especially since we know first and second preference for everyone. Sure there could be a few late injuries like Red Giant that changes things but that can happen between entries and the race anyways.

True, but I just don't really see the point in handicapping ANY race before it is drawn. I rarely, if ever, handicap a race until at least the day before it is run. The more you know about who is actually in the race, all recent works, post positions etc., the better.
Even if we did know for sure who was going to be in all of the races (which we do not), we still don't know what the post positions are. Now, in my opinion, post position is pretty meaningless in the vast majority of all horse races, but in races with larger fields - and some of the BC races fit that description - it could play a role in dictating who will be forced to gun for the lead, who is at risk of getting caught wide, etc. This is the kind of stuff I like to know before I start handicapping.
I guess there is nothing really wrong with handicapping races before they are drawn, but it seems like a bit of a waste of time given the fact that I think a good handicapper would need to look carefully at the race AFTER it is drawn anyway.

hoovesupsideyourhead 10-20-2008 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Can someone tell me what The Closeted Man just said. He's in my IGGY bin, so I can't read it. Does everyone here know about TRAKUS? I do. What about BIKE RIDING? I know about that too. I have also shown unlimited ways to BLAME OTHERS for my obvious shortcomings when it comes to "gambling". I've also only been following the sport for a few years, but I'll tell you all about it, because I ride a BIKE. I hate ANNOUNCERS. Have I mentioned that before? I also love telling people about MY IGGY BIN. Have I mentioned that? Jerkoff....

top shelf..:tro: :tro:

CSC 10-20-2008 08:14 AM

I will be only betting Europeans for the turf races, I'm going to let the Euro's beat me on dirt. Believe me I have learned from my past wagers.

GBBob 10-20-2008 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
I will be only betting Europeans for the turf races, I'm going to let the Euro's beat me on dirt. Believe me I have learned from my past wagers.

yeah...but

isn't that the problem this year?

blackthroatedwind 10-20-2008 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
I will be only betting Europeans for the turf races, I'm going to let the Euro's beat me on dirt. Believe me I have learned from my past wagers.


There are no dirt races in the BC this year ( and next year as well ).

philcski 10-20-2008 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
There are no dirt races in the BC this year ( and next year as well ).

But Pro-Ride is 87.221567788% dirt, haven't you heard? ;)

CSC 10-20-2008 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
But Pro-Ride is 87.221567788% dirt, haven't you heard? ;)

I thought it was 87.2215677889% ;)

philcski 10-20-2008 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
I thought it was 87.2215677889% ;)

depends on how many souvenirs have been left on the track before the gates open... :D

CSC 10-20-2008 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
There are no dirt races in the BC this year ( and next year as well ).

True, hey I love Coolmore for supporting the Breeders Cup, but their primary reasons seem to be to be improving their Stallian prospects. I can't have confidence on betting on a horse with that in mind. Can they win? yes but I prefer more proven horses on dirt/Syth tracks.

philcski 10-20-2008 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
True, hey I love Coolmore for supporting the Breeders Cup, but their primary reasons seem to be to be improving their Stallian prospects. I can't have confidence on betting on a horse with that in mind. Can they win? yes but I prefer more proven horses on dirt/Syth tracks.

Then again, watching GW struggle around a track he should have NEVER been on before finally losing the ultimate fight right in front of me is probably the lowest moment I've ever felt in this game.

hrfan 10-20-2008 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
Then again, watching GW struggle around a track he should have NEVER been on before finally losing the ultimate fight right in front of me is probably the lowest moment I've ever felt in this game.

This is true.

CSC 10-20-2008 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
Then again, watching GW struggle around a track he should have NEVER been on before finally losing the ultimate fight right in front of me is probably the lowest moment I've ever felt in this game.

That was a very sad moment.

jms62 10-20-2008 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
I will be only betting Europeans for the turf races, I'm going to let the Euro's beat me on dirt. Believe me I have learned from my past wagers.

A good strategy on the synthetic for the win but they may sneak into the exotics and really muck up a score...

SniperSB23 10-20-2008 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miraja2
True, but I just don't really see the point in handicapping ANY race before it is drawn. I rarely, if ever, handicap a race until at least the day before it is run. The more you know about who is actually in the race, all recent works, post positions etc., the better.
Even if we did know for sure who was going to be in all of the races (which we do not), we still don't know what the post positions are. Now, in my opinion, post position is pretty meaningless in the vast majority of all horse races, but in races with larger fields - and some of the BC races fit that description - it could play a role in dictating who will be forced to gun for the lead, who is at risk of getting caught wide, etc. This is the kind of stuff I like to know before I start handicapping.
I guess there is nothing really wrong with handicapping races before they are drawn, but it seems like a bit of a waste of time given the fact that I think a good handicapper would need to look carefully at the race AFTER it is drawn anyway.

Of course you need to go back and take another look once the official entries come out. I'm certainly not putting together actual wagers now but I think there is a benefit to capping through the races to get an idea of the horses' past performances and who will be potential pace factors. And usually when the final entries do come out there are very few adjustments that need to be made since there are very few surprises between the pre-entries and final entries.

So I don't see any problem with discussing the races now. Of course if you are just picking the horses' names that you recognize it is largely useless, but that has nothing to do with whether or not entries are out.

SniperSB23 10-20-2008 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
But Pro-Ride is 87.221567788% dirt, haven't you heard? ;)

I've seen it up close, no way it is 87% dirt.

hrfan 10-20-2008 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
What are these angles you are speaking of? Educate me...

daytona is a horse for the course and will be a huge price..
Shugs horse, is getting back to a firm turf, and is worth a play, at another huge price, Red Rocks, and the Sword Dancer winner are the 2 horses to beat.

Linny 10-20-2008 02:56 PM

The typical "elite" US turf horse is far below the best of the Euro's, year in and year out. Grand Couturier raced in Europe and was a "listed stakes" type there. Red Rocks (who could have dominated this season, if sound) was no better than a G3 horse there. When he ran with G1 horses in Europe (Manduro, Dylan Thomas, Duke of Marmalade, Soldier of Fortune, Youmzain) he was nowhere. In fact he was crushed by Dr. Dino who is not regarded as "elite" in Europe, even though he's won G1 in Europe and Asia. Now, RR does move up here because of Lasix (etc) he's still not in the league of those mentioned above.

GC also loves a soft turf course, the SA course will not likely suit him. Dancing Forever like hard turf but I don't see him having the clas of Soldier of Fortune. I'd consider Conduit from Sir Michael Stoute. He loves 12f and has handled "firmer" going in Europe. If he looks like a G2 horse, refer to the first paragraph of this post.

hrfan 10-20-2008 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny
The typical "elite" US turf horse is far below the best of the Euro's, year in and year out. Grand Couturier raced in Europe and was a "listed stakes" type there. Red Rocks (who could have dominated this season, if sound) was no better than a G3 horse there. When he ran with G1 horses in Europe (Manduro, Dylan Thomas, Duke of Marmalade, Soldier of Fortune, Youmzain) he was nowhere. In fact he was crushed by Dr. Dino who is not regarded as "elite" in Europe, even though he's won G1 in Europe and Asia. Now, RR does move up here because of Lasix (etc) he's still not in the league of those mentioned above.

GC also loves a soft turf course, the SA course will not likely suit him. Dancing Forever like hard turf but I don't see him having the clas of Soldier of Fortune. I'd consider Conduit from Sir Michael Stoute. He loves 12f and has handled "firmer" going in Europe. If he looks like a G2 horse, refer to the first paragraph of this post.

what league was Red Rocks in the first time he won this race ?
Also Europe's best are running in the Classic, correct ?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.