PDA

View Full Version : 8/28 (SAR): Travers Day


Pages : 1 [2]

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 02:58 PM
Might have been posted elsewhere, but what was Uncle Mo's fig?

I couldn't find it because no other horse in the race had run yet either.

ateamstupid
08-29-2010, 02:59 PM
I couldn't find it because no other horse in the race had run yet either.

OK, any idea what the raw number was though?

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 03:02 PM
Well, by the Beyer chart, it was faster than all the stakes. However, 5f races can vary wildly from the standard chart at Saratoga as well as many other tracks. Do a search of "Beyer Speed Chart" and you can look them up very quickly.


I just saw it posted somewhere else as a 102.

Dahoss
08-29-2010, 03:05 PM
Might have been posted elsewhere, but what was Uncle Mo's fig?

Early fig was a 102. But Beyer is consulting with PG1985 later to make sure it's correct.

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 03:06 PM
Early fig was a 102. But Beyer is consulting with PG1985 later to make sure it's correct.

He might want to consult with somebody on the Travers.

RockHardTen1985
08-29-2010, 03:06 PM
He might want to consult with somebody on the Travers.


What did you get for the Travers?

randallscott35
08-29-2010, 03:08 PM
What did you get for the Travers?

Slow. Do some work.

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 03:09 PM
What did you get for the Travers?

I'm not sure yet, but it won't be near 105. 100 is pushing it in my opinion.

Betsy
08-29-2010, 03:10 PM
In my opinion, he has not shown it yet. He'll be a big underlay in the BC.

I think he's very good, but I guess we'll see come BC day.

RockHardTen1985
08-29-2010, 03:10 PM
I'm not sure yet, but it won't be near 105. 100 is pushing it in my opinion.

Thanks.

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 03:16 PM
Thanks.

It was the only route so whoever makes it, it is a guess. Looking at the pace of the race, a 105 is extremely unlikely. There are lots of ways to look at the race, and given the biased track I could see giving a 105 thinking the winner ran a new top staying on the rail.

Of course, it wouldn't be a new top if Beyer hadn't changed a 109 (something like that at least) three races back for the winner to a 101.

randallscott35
08-29-2010, 03:19 PM
It was the only route so whoever makes it, it is a guess. Looking at the pace of the race, a 105 is extremely unlikely. There are lots of ways to look at the race, and given the biased track I could see giving a 105 thinking the winner ran a new top staying on the rail.

Of course, it wouldn't be a new top if Beyer hadn't changed a 109 (something like that at least) three races back for the winner to a 101.

93 or 95. Sundial.

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 03:22 PM
93 or 95. Sundial.

How do you come up with this?

ateamstupid
08-29-2010, 03:24 PM
How do you come up with this?

The very scientific method of pulling it out of his ass.

RockHardTen1985
08-29-2010, 03:25 PM
The very scientific method of pulling it out of his ass.


No not him, I pull things out of my ass... He is much better then me, he got rid of the rat problem QUICK.

randallscott35
08-29-2010, 03:25 PM
How do you come up with this?

The track was not slow yesterday and 203 and change is not too hot...Its a guess like I thought Uncle Mo was 100 and not a 110 like everyone yesterday.

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 03:26 PM
The top two had career route tops of 99 and 97, and now we are asked to believe they ran a 105 at 10f with an honest to fast pace?

randallscott35
08-29-2010, 03:27 PM
The very scientific method of pulling it out of his ass.

Since most of Zenyatta's numbers are made up what difference does it make. Its a guess. Of course they love those triple digits for G1 races so I'm sure this will be no different.

hockey2315
08-29-2010, 03:30 PM
The top two had career route tops of 99 and 97, and now we are asked to believe they ran a 105 at 10f with an honest to fast pace?

Seems to fall right in line for First Dude.

cmorioles
08-29-2010, 03:38 PM
Seems to fall right in line for First Dude.

I don't think he would be my starting point for making a number yesterday, but considering the pace I would have projected him for no more than 90 yesterday, which falls right in line with the race getting about 100.

Sightseek
08-29-2010, 08:40 PM
10 week layoff for Discreetly Mine into the BC Sprint.. :rolleyes:

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/58632/pletcher-super-saver-will-undergo-tests

They are also checking to see if Super Saver has any other problems besides I'mnotatChurchillitis.

Betsy
08-29-2010, 09:03 PM
10 week layoff for Discreetly Mine into the BC Sprint.. :rolleyes:

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/58632/pletcher-super-saver-will-undergo-tests

They are also checking to see if Super Saver has any other problems besides I'mnotatChurchillitis.

Not thrilled about that with DM, but he has had several hard races in a row........Hopefully Todd will change his mind.

Clip-Clop
08-30-2010, 11:57 AM
I am just bummed that Lezcano found a way to not win with this guy.

Betsy
08-30-2010, 05:49 PM
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/racing-news/2010/August/30/Miners-Reserve-out-indefinitely-with-knee-injury.aspx

This sucks because I really like this horse....well, at least he doesn't need surgery.