New York Super Bowl in '14

[timmgirvan]

DOH!! WTHell were they thinking?.....certainly not about the fans.
How about the O/U being 23 pts?:confused:

[pointman]

I will be more than happy to watch the game on the comfort of my couch just a few miles away while others spend a fortune to freeze their azzes off.

[opusone]

So much for the media types and corporate folks playing a little golf or going fishing. I'm partial to Tampa hosting though.

[ninetoone]

I like it...I hope it snows too.

[slotdirt]

What fans? The only people who actually attend the Super Bowl are media folks. I think it's a great move by the NFL, and will probably be their most profitable Super Bowl yet.

[Cannon Shell]

It is a plot to keep Miami from winning 4 consecutive SB's

[Hickory Hill Hoff]

About time!

[docicu3]

It is a plot to keep Miami from winning 4 consecutive SB's

And the New England Super Bowl will likely take place.....


















..........when hell freezes over for heat during the game. PSL's are ruining this game for the fans.

[MaTH716]

All this is, is a tribute/favor to the Mara family. For all they (Wellington) did for football (revenue sharing of TV rights). Also to help them get naming rights for the new billion dollar stadium.
I think it's a cool concept being from the area. But as a football fan I don't think it is fair. The whole concept of a neutral site is trying to keep the playing field level. If the Chargers end up playing the Packers in the 2014 Super Bowl, there is a very good chance that the Packers would be playing with an unfair advantage.
If they wanted and cared about getting this game so badly, then they should have put a dome on the stadium.

[jms62]

All this is, is a tribute/favor to the Mara family. For all they (Wellington) did for football (revenue sharing of TV rights). Also to help them get naming rights for the new billion dollar stadium.
I think it's a cool concept being from the area. But as a football fan I don't think it is fair. The whole concept of a neutral site is trying to keep the playing field level. If the Chargers end up playing the Packers in the 2014 Super Bowl, there is a very good chance that the Packers would be playing with an unfair advantage.
If they wanted and cared about getting this game so badly, then they should have put a dome on the stadium.

Agree:tro:

[ateamstupid]

All this is, is a tribute/favor to the Mara family. For all they (Wellington) did for football (revenue sharing of TV rights). Also to help them get naming rights for the new billion dollar stadium.
I think it's a cool concept being from the area. But as a football fan I don't think it is fair. The whole concept of a neutral site is trying to keep the playing field level. If the Chargers end up playing the Packers in the 2014 Super Bowl, there is a very good chance that the Packers would be playing with an unfair advantage.
If they wanted and cared about getting this game so badly, then they should have put a dome on the stadium.

Like the Chargers would make the Super Bowl anyway. http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif

[MaTH716]

Like the Chargers would make the Super Bowl anyway. http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif

I'm sorry Joe. I wasn't thinking of you. I should have used the Bucs/Jets comparison instead. :rolleyes:

[ateamstupid]

I'm sorry Joe. I wasn't thinking of you. I should have used the Bucs/Jets comparison instead. :rolleyes:

It's more likely than the ultimate perennial paper champion finally getting there.

[slotdirt]

It would also be unfair to those poor domed teams to have to play in the elements! Let me get Jerry Jones a kleenex.